Literature DB >> 14597361

The IAEA/WHO TLD postal dose quality audits for radiotherapy: a perspective of dosimetry practices at hospitals in developing countries.

Joanna Izewska1, Pedro Andreo, Stanislav Vatnitsky, Ken R Shortt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The IAEA/WHO TLD postal programme for external audits of the calibration of high-energy photon beams used in radiotherapy has been in operation since 1969. This work presents a survey of the 1317 TLD audits carried out during 1998-2001. The TLD results are discussed from the perspective of the dosimetry practices in hospitals in developing countries, based on the information provided by the participants in their TLD data sheets.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A detailed analysis of the TLD data sheets is systematically performed at the IAEA. It helps to trace the source of any discrepancy between the TLD measured dose and the user stated dose, and also provides information on equipment, dosimetry procedures and the use of codes of practice in the countries participating in the IAEA/WHO TLD audits. RESULT: The TLD results are within the 5% acceptance limit for 84% of the participants. The results for accelerator beams are typically better than for Co-60 units. Approximately 75% of participants reported dosimetry data, including details on their procedure for dose determination from ionisation chamber measurements. For the remaining 25% of hospitals, who did not submit these data, the results are poorer than the global TLD results. Most hospitals have Farmer type ionisation chambers calibrated in terms of air kerma by a standards laboratory. Less than 10% of the hospitals use new codes of practice based on standards of absorbed dose to water.
CONCLUSION: Despite the differences in dosimetry equipment, traceability to different standards laboratories and uncertainties arising from the use of various dosimetry codes of practice, the determination of absorbed dose to water for photon beams typically agrees within 2% among hospitals. Correct implementation of any of the dosimetry protocols should ensure that significant errors in dosimetry are avoided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14597361     DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(03)00245-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  8 in total

1.  TLD and OSLD dosimetry systems for remote audits of radiotherapy external beam calibration.

Authors:  P Alvarez; S F Kry; F Stingo; D Followill
Journal:  Radiat Meas       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 1.898

2.  Radiotherapy dosimetry audit: three decades of improving standards and accuracy in UK clinical practice and trials.

Authors:  Catharine H Clark; Edwin G A Aird; Steve Bolton; Elizabeth A Miles; Andrew Nisbet; Julia A D Snaith; Russell A S Thomas; Karen Venables; David I Thwaites
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Cancer control in developing countries: using health data and health services research to measure and improve access, quality and efficiency.

Authors:  Timothy P Hanna; Alfred C T Kangolle
Journal:  BMC Int Health Hum Rights       Date:  2010-10-13

4.  A novel simple phantom for verifying the dose of radiation therapy.

Authors:  J H Lee; L T Chang; A C Shiau; C W Chen; Y J Liao; W J Li; M S Lee; S M Hsu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Beam Output Audit results within the EORTC Radiation Oncology Group network.

Authors:  Coen W Hurkmans; Melissa Christiaens; Sandra Collette; Damien Charles Weber
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  An analysis of the regulatory program of quality audits in radiotherapy in Brazil from 1995 to 2007.

Authors:  Eduardo de Paiva; Luiz A R da Rosa; Ricardo R A Brito; Lidia V de Sá; Ana C M Dovales; Delano V S Batista; Ricardo A Giannoni; Alexandre F Velasco
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 2.243

7.  Remote beam output audits: a global assessment of results out of tolerance.

Authors:  Stephen F Kry; Christine B Peterson; Rebecca M Howell; Joanna Izewska; Jessica Lye; Catharine H Clark; Mitsuhiro Nakamura; Coen Hurkmans; Paola Alvarez; Andrew Alves; Tomislav Bokulic; David Followill; Pavel Kazantsev; Jessica Lowenstein; Andrea Molineu; Jacob Palmer; Susan A Smith; Paige Taylor; Paulina Wesolowska; Ivan Williams
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-09-16

8.  Use of a Checklist Approach on a Telecobalt in an Attempt to Reduce Human Errors in Radiotherapy Delivery and Improve Therapeutic Ratio.

Authors:  Hari Mukundan; Sankalp Singh; Nishant Lohia; Manoj Kumar Semwal; Vijendra Kumar; Sharad Bhatnagar; Arti Sarin; Gaurav Trivedi
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2021-05-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.