Literature DB >> 14597245

Flemish obstetricians' personal preference regarding mode of delivery and attitude towards caesarean section on demand.

Yves Jacquemyn1, Fatima Ahankour, Guy Martens.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess Flemish obstetricians' preferences about mode of delivery for themselves or their partners and to determine the frequency of caesarean section on demand in Flanders. STUDY
DESIGN: A structured anonymous postal questionnaire was sent to all 672 registered gynaecologist-obstetricians in Flanders.
RESULTS: The response rate was 44%. In the case of an uncomplicated singleton first pregnancy with a cephalic presentation 2% preferred elective caesarean section. There was no difference between male and female obstetricians. Seventy percent said that they would never perform caesarean section on demand. At least 2.6% of all caesarean sections in Flanders seems to be performed on patient's demand.
CONCLUSION: The attitude of Flemish gynaecologist-obstetricians is clearly in favour of vaginal delivery both for themselves, their partners and their patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14597245     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-2115(03)00214-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  8 in total

1.  Medical students' personal choice for mode of delivery in Santa Catarina, Brazil: a cross-sectional, quantitative study.

Authors:  Tatiane Watanabe; Roxana Knobel; Guilherme Suchard; Mario Julio Franco; Eleonora d'Orsi; Elenice Bertanha Consonni; Marcos Consonni
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 2.463

2.  The intelligence quotient of school aged children delivered by cesarean section and vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Nayereh Khadem; Talaat Khadivzadeh
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2010

3.  Improving the organisation of maternal health service delivery and optimising childbirth by increasing vaginal birth after caesarean section through enhanced women-centred care (OptiBIRTH trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN10612254).

Authors:  Mike Clarke; Gerard Savage; Valerie Smith; Deirdre Daly; Declan Devane; Mechthild M Gross; Susanne Grylka-Baeschlin; Patricia Healy; Sandra Morano; Jane Nicoletti; Cecily Begley
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Appropriateness of elective caesarean deliveries in a perinatal network: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Françoise Vendittelli; Marie-Caroline Tassié; Laurent Gerbaud; Didier Lémery
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 5.  Clinician-centred interventions to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC): a systematic review.

Authors:  Ingela Lundgren; Valerie Smith; Christina Nilsson; Katri Vehvilainen-Julkunen; Jane Nicoletti; Declan Devane; Annette Bernloehr; Evelien van Limbeek; Joan Lalor; Cecily Begley
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Pregnant women's preferences for mode of delivery questionnaire: Psychometric properties.

Authors:  Fereshteh Zamani-Alavijeh; Parvin Shahry; Maryam Kalhori; Marzieh Araban
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2017-04-19

Review 7.  Interventions targeted at health professionals to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Carol Kingdon; Soo Downe; Ana Pilar Betran
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-12-16       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Cesarean delivery on maternal request: can the ethical problem be solved by the principlist approach?

Authors:  Tore Nilstun; Marwan Habiba; Göran Lingman; Rodolfo Saracci; Monica Da Frè; Marina Cuttini
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 2.652

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.