H Nauta1, H Hospers, A Jansen. 1. Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. helga.nauta@spsy.azm.nl
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The effectiveness of a cognitive and a behavioural treatment for obese binge eaters and obese non-binge eaters was evaluated at 1-year follow-up. Furthermore, we examined the role of weight changes on psychological well-being at 1-year follow-up. DESIGN AND METHOD: Participants were reassessed 6 months and 1 year after they had finished a group cognitive treatment or a group behavioural treatment. The outcome measures were; psychological well-being (concerns about shape, weight and eating, self-esteem and depression), binge eating, and weight. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Analyses on the completers' sample revealed that both treatments had a markedly positive and lasting impact on shape concern, weight concern and eating concern, binge eating, self-esteem, and depression at 1-year follow-up. Cognitive treatment was not superior to behavioural treatment on most outcome measures. This might be due to selective drop-out. Analyses including non-responders showed that the cognitive treatment was superior on shape, weight and eating concern, and binge eating. The 1-year follow-up results for weight-loss were disappointing. Between pre-treatment and 1-year follow-up participants in the behaviour treatment lost 3.0 kg, while participants in the cognitive treatment lost 0.3 kg. However, participants who gained weight were as successful on changes in psychological well-being changes as participants who lost weight.
OBJECTIVES: The effectiveness of a cognitive and a behavioural treatment for obese binge eaters and obese non-binge eaters was evaluated at 1-year follow-up. Furthermore, we examined the role of weight changes on psychological well-being at 1-year follow-up. DESIGN AND METHOD:Participants were reassessed 6 months and 1 year after they had finished a group cognitive treatment or a group behavioural treatment. The outcome measures were; psychological well-being (concerns about shape, weight and eating, self-esteem and depression), binge eating, and weight. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Analyses on the completers' sample revealed that both treatments had a markedly positive and lasting impact on shape concern, weight concern and eating concern, binge eating, self-esteem, and depression at 1-year follow-up. Cognitive treatment was not superior to behavioural treatment on most outcome measures. This might be due to selective drop-out. Analyses including non-responders showed that the cognitive treatment was superior on shape, weight and eating concern, and binge eating. The 1-year follow-up results for weight-loss were disappointing. Between pre-treatment and 1-year follow-up participants in the behaviour treatment lost 3.0 kg, while participants in the cognitive treatment lost 0.3 kg. However, participants who gained weight were as successful on changes in psychological well-being changes as participants who lost weight.
Authors: Lucy F Faulconbridge; Thomas A Wadden; John G Thomas; LaShanda R Jones-Corneille; David B Sarwer; Anthony N Fabricatore Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2012-11-14 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: Anne Ahnis; Andrea Riedl; Andrea Figura; Elisabeth Steinhagen-Thiessen; Max E Liebl; Burghard F Klapp Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence Date: 2012-03-07 Impact factor: 2.711