Literature DB >> 14596320

Contamination dose from photoneutron processes in bodily tissues during therapeutic radiation delivery.

F Difilippo1, L Papiez, V Moskvin, D Peplow, C DesRosiers, J Johnson, R Timmerman, M Randall, R Lillie.   

Abstract

Dose to the total body from induced radiation resulting from primary exposure to radiotherapeutic beams is not detailed in routine treatment planning though this information is potentially important for better estimates of health risks including secondary cancers. This information can also allow better management of patient treatment logistics, suggesting better timing, sequencing, and conduct of treatment. Monte Carlo simulations capable of taking into account all interactions contributing to the dose to the total body, including neutron scattering and induced radioactivity, provide the most versatile and accurate tool for investigating these effects. MCNPX code version 2.2.6 with full IAEA library of photoneutron cross sections is particularly suited to trace not only photoneutrons but also protons and heavy ion particles that result from photoneutron interactions. Specifically, the MCNPX code is applied here to the problem of dose calculations in traditional (non-IMRT) photon beam therapy. Points of calculation are located in the head, where the primary irradiation has been directed, but also in the superior portion of the torso of the ORNL Mathematical Human Phantom. We calculated dose contributions from neutrons, protons, deutrons, tritons and He-3 that are produced at the time of photoneutron interactions in the body and that would not have been accounted for by conventional radiation oncology dosimetry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14596320     DOI: 10.1118/1.1612947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  5 in total

1.  Micronuclei in human peripheral blood lymphocytes exposed to mixed beams of X-rays and alpha particles.

Authors:  Elina Staaf; Karl Brehwens; Siamak Haghdoost; Sander Nievaart; Katerina Pachnerova-Brabcova; Joanna Czub; Janusz Braziewicz; Andrzej Wojcik
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 2.  A review of dosimetry studies on external-beam radiation treatment with respect to second cancer induction.

Authors:  X George Xu; Bryan Bednarz; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-06-09       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Effects of field parameters on IMRT plan quality for gynecological cancer: a case study.

Authors:  Albert Y C Fung; Charles A Enke; Komanduri M Ayyangar; Robert B Thompson; Weining Zhen; Natarajan V Raman; David Djajaputra; Sicong Li; Ramasamy M Nehru; Sushakumari Pillai; Paul Sourivong; Mary Headley; Ann L Yager
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2005-08-12       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Gamma-H2AX foci in cells exposed to a mixed beam of X-rays and alpha particles.

Authors:  Elina Staaf; Karl Brehwens; Siamak Haghdoost; Joanna Czub; Andrzej Wojcik
Journal:  Genome Integr       Date:  2012-11-02

5.  Simultaneous induction of dispersed and clustered DNA lesions compromises DNA damage response in human peripheral blood lymphocytes.

Authors:  Lei Cheng; Beata Brzozowska; Alice Sollazzo; Lovisa Lundholm; Halina Lisowska; Siamak Haghdoost; Andrzej Wojcik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.