Literature DB >> 14595766

Conserved and convergent organization in the optic lobes of insects and isopods, with reference to other crustacean taxa.

I Sinakevitch1, J K Douglass, G Scholtz, R Loesel, N J Strausfeld.   

Abstract

The shared organization of three optic lobe neuropils-the lamina, medulla, and lobula-linked by chiasmata has been used to support arguments that insects and malacostracans are sister groups. However, in certain insects, the lobula is accompanied by a tectum-like fourth neuropil, the lobula plate, characterized by wide-field tangential neurons and linked to the medulla by uncrossed axons. The identification of a lobula plate in an isopod crustacean raises the question of whether the lobula plate of insects and isopods evolved convergently or are derived from a common ancestor. This question is here investigated by comparisons of insect and crustacean optic lobes. The basal branchiopod crustacean Triops has only two visual neuropils and no optic chiasma. This finding contrasts with the phyllocarid Nebalia pugettensis, a basal malacostracan whose lamina is linked by a chiasma to a medulla that is linked by a second chiasma to a retinotopic outswelling of the lateral protocerebrum, called the protolobula. In Nebalia, uncrossed axons from the medulla supply a minute fourth optic neuropil. Eumalacostracan crustaceans also possess two deep neuropils, one receiving crossed axons, the other uncrossed axons. However, in primitive insects, there is no separate fourth optic neuropil. Malacostracans and insects also differ in that the insect medulla comprises two nested neuropils separated by a layer of axons, called the Cuccati bundle. Comparisons suggest that neuroarchitectures of the lamina and medulla distal to the Cuccati bundle are equivalent to the eumalacostracan lamina and entire medulla. The occurrence of a second optic chiasma and protolobula are suggested to be synapomorphic for a malacostracan/insect clade. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14595766     DOI: 10.1002/cne.10925

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Neurol        ISSN: 0021-9967            Impact factor:   3.215


  36 in total

1.  Binocular visual integration in the crustacean nervous system.

Authors:  Julieta Sztarker; Daniel Tomsic
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-08-19       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  What arthropod brains say about arthropod phylogeny.

Authors:  Susan E Fahrbach
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  From variable to constant cell numbers: cellular characteristics of the arthropod nervous system argue against a sister-group relationship of Chelicerata and "Myriapoda" but favour the Mandibulata concept.

Authors:  Steffen Harzsch; Carsten H G Müller; Harald Wolf
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2004-12-09       Impact factor: 0.900

4.  Arthropod phylogeny: onychophoran brain organization suggests an archaic relationship with a chelicerate stem lineage.

Authors:  Nicholas J Strausfeld; Camilla Mok Strausfeld; Rudi Loesel; David Rowell; Sally Stowe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Genes and homology in nervous system evolution: comparing gene functions, expression patterns, and cell type molecular fingerprints.

Authors:  Detlev Arendt
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 1.919

Review 6.  Brain organization and the origin of insects: an assessment.

Authors:  Nicholas James Strausfeld
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Neural mechanisms underlying the evolvability of behaviour.

Authors:  Paul S Katz
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Complex brain and optic lobes in an early Cambrian arthropod.

Authors:  Xiaoya Ma; Xianguang Hou; Gregory D Edgecombe; Nicholas J Strausfeld
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Mutation of the Drosophila vesicular GABA transporter disrupts visual figure detection.

Authors:  Hao Fei; Dawnis M Chow; Audrey Chen; Rafael Romero-Calderón; Wei S Ong; Larry C Ackerson; Nigel T Maidment; Julie H Simpson; Mark A Frye; David E Krantz
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Motion processing streams in Drosophila are behaviorally specialized.

Authors:  Alexander Y Katsov; Thomas R Clandinin
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.