Literature DB >> 14594920

Assessing the value of assertive outreach. Qualitative study of process and outcome generation in the UK700 trial.

Tim Weaver1, Peter Tyrer, Jane Ritchie, Adrian Renton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is unclear why intensive case management (ICM) failed to reduce hospitalisation in the UK700 trial. AIMS: To investigate outcome generation in the UK700 trial.
METHOD: A qualitative investigation was undertaken in one UK700 centre.
RESULTS: Both intensive and standard case management practised individual casework, employed assertive outreach with comparable frequency, and performed similarly in the out-patient management of emergencies and in-patient discharge. However, ICM was advantaged in managing some non-compliance and undertaking casework that prevented psychiatric emergencies. Absence of team-based management and bureaucratised access to social care limited the impact of these differences on outcomes and the effective practice of assertive outreach, although this was relevant to only a sub-population of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The impact of ICM was undermined by organisational factors. Sensitive anticipatory casework, which prevents psychiatric emergencies, may make ICM more effective than an exclusive focus on assertive outreach. Our findings demonstrate the value of qualitative research in evaluating complex interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14594920     DOI: 10.1192/bjp.183.5.437

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0007-1250            Impact factor:   9.319


  7 in total

1.  Intensive case management for severe psychotic illness: is there a general benefit for patients with complex needs? A secondary analysis of the UK700 trial data.

Authors:  Chris Metcalfe; Ian R White; Tim Weaver; Obioha C Ukoumunne; Kate Harvey; Theresa Tattan; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 4.328

2.  Successful engagement: a mixed methods study of the approaches of assertive community treatment and community mental health teams in the REACT trial.

Authors:  Helen Killaspy; Sonia Johnson; Barbara Pierce; Paul Bebbington; Stephen Pilling; Fiona Nolan; Michael King
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 4.328

3.  Model fidelity of assertive community treatment for clients with first-episode psychosis: a target group-specific application.

Authors:  M J M Verhaegh; I M B Bongers; H Kroon; H F L Garretsen
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2008-10-16

Review 4.  Monitoring use of knowledge and evaluating outcomes.

Authors:  Sharon E Straus; Jacqueline Tetroe; Ian D Graham; Merrick Zwarenstein; Onil Bhattacharyya; Sasha Shepperd
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Can we systematically review studies that evaluate complex interventions?

Authors:  Sasha Shepperd; Simon Lewin; Sharon Straus; Mike Clarke; Martin P Eccles; Ray Fitzpatrick; Geoff Wong; Aziz Sheikh
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 11.069

6.  Assertive community treatment for elderly people with severe mental illness.

Authors:  Jolanda Stobbe; Niels C L Mulder; Bert-Jan Roosenschoon; Marja Depla; Hans Kroon
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 3.630

7.  The effectiveness of assertive community treatment for elderly patients with severe mental illness: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jolanda Stobbe; André I Wierdsma; Rob M Kok; Hans Kroon; Bert-Jan Roosenschoon; Marja Depla; Cornelis L Mulder
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 3.630

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.