OBJECTIVE: To quantify regional left ventricular (LV) function and contractile reserve in Q wave and non-Q wave regions in patients with previous myocardial infarction. DESIGN: An observational study. SETTING: Tertiary care centre. PATIENTS: 81 patients with previous myocardial infarction and depressed LV function. INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent surface ECG at rest and pulsed wave tissue Doppler imaging at rest and during low dose dobutamine infusion. The left ventricle was divided into four major regions (anterior, inferoposterior, septal, and lateral). Severely hypokinetic, akinetic, and dyskinetic regions on two dimensional echocardiography at rest were considered dysfunctional. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Regional myocardial systolic velocity (Vs) at rest and the change in Vs during low dose dobutamine infusion (DeltaVs) in dysfunctional regions with and without Q waves on surface ECG. RESULTS: 220 (69%) regions were dysfunctional; 60 of these regions corresponded to Q waves and 160 were not related to Q waves. Vs and DeltaVs were lower in dysfunctional than in non-dysfunctional regions (mean (SD) Vs 6.2 (1.9) cm/s v 7.1 (1.7) cm/s (p < 0.001), and DeltaVs 1.9 (1.9) cm/s v 2.6 (2.5) cm/s (p = 0.009), respectively). There were no significant differences in Vs and DeltaVs among dysfunctional regions with and without Q waves (Q wave regions: Vs 6.2 (1.8) cm/s, DeltaVs 1.6 (2.2) cm/s; non-Q wave regions: Vs 6.3 (1.9) cm/s, DeltaVs 2.0 (2.0) cm/s). CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative pulsed wave tissue Doppler demonstrated that, among dysfunctional regions, Q waves on the ECG do not indicate more severe dysfunction, and myocardial contractile reserve is comparable in Q wave and non-Q wave dysfunctional myocardium.
OBJECTIVE: To quantify regional left ventricular (LV) function and contractile reserve in Q wave and non-Q wave regions in patients with previous myocardial infarction. DESIGN: An observational study. SETTING: Tertiary care centre. PATIENTS: 81 patients with previous myocardial infarction and depressed LV function. INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent surface ECG at rest and pulsed wave tissue Doppler imaging at rest and during low dose dobutamine infusion. The left ventricle was divided into four major regions (anterior, inferoposterior, septal, and lateral). Severely hypokinetic, akinetic, and dyskinetic regions on two dimensional echocardiography at rest were considered dysfunctional. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Regional myocardial systolic velocity (Vs) at rest and the change in Vs during low dose dobutamine infusion (DeltaVs) in dysfunctional regions with and without Q waves on surface ECG. RESULTS: 220 (69%) regions were dysfunctional; 60 of these regions corresponded to Q waves and 160 were not related to Q waves. Vs and DeltaVs were lower in dysfunctional than in non-dysfunctional regions (mean (SD) Vs 6.2 (1.9) cm/s v 7.1 (1.7) cm/s (p < 0.001), and DeltaVs 1.9 (1.9) cm/s v 2.6 (2.5) cm/s (p = 0.009), respectively). There were no significant differences in Vs and DeltaVs among dysfunctional regions with and without Q waves (Q wave regions: Vs 6.2 (1.8) cm/s, DeltaVs 1.6 (2.2) cm/s; non-Q wave regions: Vs 6.3 (1.9) cm/s, DeltaVs 2.0 (2.0) cm/s). CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative pulsed wave tissue Doppler demonstrated that, among dysfunctional regions, Q waves on the ECG do not indicate more severe dysfunction, and myocardial contractile reserve is comparable in Q wave and non-Q wave dysfunctional myocardium.
Authors: R Rambaldi; D Poldermans; J J Bax; E Boersma; A Elhendy; W Vletter; J R Roelandt; R Valkema Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: J H Cornel; J J Bax; A Elhendy; A P Maat; G J Kimman; M L Geleijnse; R Rambaldi; E Boersma; P M Fioretti Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1998-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: D C Sevilla; N B Wagner; W D Anderson; R E Ideker; K A Reimer; E M Mikat; D B Hackel; R H Selvester; G S Wagner Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 1990-10-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: K S Lee; T H Marwick; S A Cook; R T Go; J S Fix; K B James; S K Sapp; W J MacIntyre; J D Thomas Journal: Circulation Date: 1994-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: J J Bax; D Poldermans; A Elhendy; J H Cornel; E Boersma; R Rambaldi; J R Roelandt; P M Fioretti Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1999-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: R Sciagrà; G Bisi; G M Santoro; F Zerauschek; S Sestini; P Pedenovi; R Pappagallo; P F Fazzini Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1997-08 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: J J Bax; J H Cornel; F C Visser; P M Fioretti; A van Lingen; J M Huitink; O Kamp; F Nijland; J R Roelandt; C A Visser Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1997-08 Impact factor: 24.094