Literature DB >> 14594320

Clotting time by free oscillation rheometry and visual inspection and a viscoelastic description of the clotting phenomenon.

M Rånby1, S Ramström, P O Svensson, T L Lindahl.   

Abstract

An automated procedure for determination of clotting time in whole blood was validated by direct comparison with the reference method, visual clotting time determination. The procedure was based on a 10 Hz free oscillation rheometer (FOR) of our design, the ReoRox 4. Recalcified citrated blood samples (n = 30), clotting in the range 4 to 20 min, were used in the validation. Every 30 s of the analysis, as the change in stiffness (deltaG*) of the sample was monitored by FOR, the sample cup was shortly removed from the FOR and its contents inspected for first signs of clotting, i.e. visual clotting time determination. Various FOR clotting criteria were attempted. Best correlation to visual clotting time was found when deltaG* reached 0.01 Pa, which yielded linear regression slope, intercept and r2 of 0.98, 0.09 min and 0.98, respectively. For comparison, six plasma samples were analyzed in the same way and gave almost the same results. The accuracy of the FOR determinations was checked by also analyzing, in parallel, portions of the sample with a conventional oscillation rheometer, a Bohlin VOR. The rationale is given for preferring deltaG* over G* as a FOR monitoring function in coagulation tests and for including median filtration of the primary FOR data. An extension of the FOR theory to include deltaG* and evidence in support of inhomogeneous blood clotting are also given.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14594320     DOI: 10.1080/00365510310002095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest        ISSN: 0036-5513            Impact factor:   1.713


  2 in total

1.  Free oscillation rheometry monitoring of haemodilution and hypothermia and correction with fibrinogen and factor XIII concentrates.

Authors:  Dag Winstedt; Nahreen Tynngård; Knut Olanders; Ulf Schött
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Thromboelastometry versus free-oscillation rheometry and enoxaparin versus tinzaparin: an in-vitro study comparing two viscoelastic haemostatic tests' dose-responses to two low molecular weight heparins at the time of withdrawing epidural catheters from ten patients after major surgery.

Authors:  Owain Thomas; Anna Larsson; Nahreen Tynngård; Ulf Schött
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 2.217

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.