Literature DB >> 14593853

Physiological and psychological effects of delivering medical news using a simulated physician-patient scenario.

Lorenzo Cohen1, Walter F Baile, Evelyn Henninger, Sandeep K Agarwal, Andrzej P Kudelka, Renato Lenzi, Janet Sterner, Gailen D Marshall.   

Abstract

We examined the acute stress response associated with having to deliver either bad or good medical news using a simulated physician-patient scenario. Twenty-five healthy medical students were randomly assigned to a bad medical news (BN), a good medical news (GN), or a control group that read magazines during the session. Self-report measures were obtained before and after the task. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured throughout the task period. Four blood samples were obtained across the task period. The BN and GN tasks produced significant increases in self-reported distress and cardiovascular responses compared with the control group. There was also a significant increase in natural killer cell function 10 min into the task in the BN group compared with the control group. The BN task was also somewhat more stressful than the GN task, as shown by the self-report and cardiovascular data. These findings suggest that a simulated physician-patient scenario produces an acute stress response in the "physician," with the delivery of bad medical news more stressful than the delivery of good medical news.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14593853     DOI: 10.1023/a:1025724118504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Med        ISSN: 0160-7715


  15 in total

Review 1.  Breaking bad news. A review of the literature.

Authors:  J T Ptacek; T L Eberhardt
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-08-14       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Medical students' fears about breaking bad news.

Authors:  N Sykes
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-09-02       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Teaching clinical skills to medical students: the use of simulated patients and videotaping in general practice.

Authors:  B R McAvoy
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 6.251

4.  General practitioners and psychosocial problems: An evaluation using pseudopatients.

Authors:  A Owen; R Winkler
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1974-09-14       Impact factor: 7.738

5.  Psychological stress and platelet activation: differences in platelet reactivity in healthy men during active and passive stressors.

Authors:  S M Patterson; S G Zakowski; M H Hall; L Cohen; K Wollman; A Baum
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.267

Review 6.  Psychoneuroimmunology and health consequences: data and shared mechanisms.

Authors:  J K Kiecolt-Glaser; R Glaser
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.312

7.  Breaking bad news: why is it still so difficult?

Authors:  R Buckman
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-05-26

8.  Measuring physicians' performances by using simulated patients.

Authors:  G R Norman; V R Neufeld; A Walsh; C A Woodward; G A McConvey
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1985-12

Review 9.  Psychoneuroimmunology. Implications for oncology?

Authors:  D H Bovbjerg
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Simulated patients and the assessment of medical students' interpersonal skills.

Authors:  R W Sanson-Fisher; A D Poole
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 6.251

View more
  4 in total

1.  Teaching communication and stress management skills to junior physicians dealing with cancer patients: a Belgian Interuniversity Curriculum.

Authors:  Isabelle Bragard; Darius Razavi; Serge Marchal; Isabelle Merckaert; Nicole Delvaux; Yves Libert; Christine Reynaert; Jacques Boniver; Jean Klastersky; Pierre Scalliet; Anne-Marie Etienne
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Voice analysis during bad news discussion in oncology: reduced pitch, decreased speaking rate, and nonverbal communication of empathy.

Authors:  Monica McHenry; Patricia A Parker; Walter F Baile; Renato Lenzi
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Defining Objective Measures of Physician Stress in Simulated Critical Communication Encounters.

Authors:  Amy H J Wolfe; Pamela S Hinds; Adre J du Plessis; Heather Gordish-Dressman; Robert M Arnold; Lamia Soghier
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2022-06-30

4.  The effect of a biofeedback-based stress management tool on physician stress: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Jane B Lemaire; Jean E Wallace; Adriane M Lewin; Jill de Grood; Jeffrey P Schaefer
Journal:  Open Med       Date:  2011-10-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.