Literature DB >> 14593479

Prospero and Snail expression during spider neurogenesis.

Mathias Weller1, Diethard Tautz.   

Abstract

Analysis of early neurogenesis in the spider Cupiennius salei (Chelicerata, Aranea, Ctenidae) has shown that the cells of the central nervous system are recruited from clusters of cells that invaginate from the neuroectoderm. This is in contrast to Drosophila, where only single cells delaminate and become neuroblasts, the stem cells of the nervous system. In order to compare the processes further, we have cloned homologues of the pan-neural Drosophila genes prospero and snail from the spider and have analysed their RNA and protein expression pattern. We find that snail expression is transient and only a subset of neural cells expresses Snail protein at any given time, making it difficult to assess whether it is indeed a pan-neural gene in the spider. Prospero protein expression, on the other hand, is seen in all invaginating cells and continues throughout differentiation of the neurons. In contrast to Drosophila, asymmetric localization cannot be detected, even in cells that still divide. Our results provide no evidence for neuroblasts or stem cells in the spider, although there are a limited number of mitoses in the cells that are derived from the invaginating clusters. These aspects of spider neurogenesis are more similar to the neurogenesis process known from vertebrates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14593479     DOI: 10.1007/s00427-003-0362-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Genes Evol        ISSN: 0949-944X            Impact factor:   0.900


  36 in total

1.  Double-stranded RNA interference in the spider Cupiennius salei: the role of Distal-less is evolutionarily conserved in arthropod appendage formation.

Authors:  M Schoppmeier; W G Damen
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 0.900

Review 2.  Neural stem cells: from fly to vertebrates.

Authors:  C Q Doe; S Fuerstenberg; C Y Peng
Journal:  J Neurobiol       Date:  1998-08

3.  Prospero is a panneural transcription factor that modulates homeodomain protein activity.

Authors:  B Hassan; L Li; K A Bremer; W Chang; J Pinsonneault; H Vaessin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Staufen-dependent localization of prospero mRNA contributes to neuroblast daughter-cell fate.

Authors:  J Broadus; S Fuerstenberg; C Q Doe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-02-19       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Asymmetric segregation of Numb and Prospero during cell division.

Authors:  J A Knoblich; L Y Jan; Y N Jan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-10-19       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  A Caenorhabditis elegans prospero homologue defines a novel domain.

Authors:  T R Bürglin
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 13.807

7.  Early events in insect neurogenesis. II. The role of cell interactions and cell lineage in the determination of neuronal precursor cells.

Authors:  C Q Doe; C S Goodman
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 3.582

8.  The mesoderm determinant snail collaborates with related zinc-finger proteins to control Drosophila neurogenesis.

Authors:  S I Ashraf; X Hu; J Roote; Y T Ip
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-11-15       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Evolutionary conservation pattern of zinc-finger domains of Drosophila segmentation genes.

Authors:  R J Sommer; M Retzlaff; K Goerlich; K Sander; D Tautz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-11-15       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Mechanism of glia-neuron cell-fate switch in the Drosophila thoracic neuroblast 6-4 lineage.

Authors:  Y Akiyama-Oda; Y Hotta; S Tsukita; H Oda
Journal:  Development       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.868

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Evolving specialization of the arthropod nervous system.

Authors:  Erin Jarvis; Heather S Bruce; Nipam H Patel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  One of the main forces that advance all fields of scientific inquiry is the establishment of unifying principles.

Authors:  Volker Hartenstein; Diethard Tautz
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2004-11-19       Impact factor: 0.900

3.  Analysis of snail genes in the crustacean Parhyale hawaiensis: insight into snail gene family evolution.

Authors:  Roberta L Hannibal; Alivia L Price; Ronald J Parchem; Nipam H Patel
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 0.900

4.  Insights into the evolution of the snail superfamily from metazoan wide molecular phylogenies and expression data in annelids.

Authors:  Pierre Kerner; Johanne Hung; Julien Béhague; Martine Le Gouar; Guillaume Balavoine; Michel Vervoort
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 3.260

5.  Growth patterns in Onychophora (velvet worms): lack of a localised posterior proliferation zone.

Authors:  Georg Mayer; Chiharu Kato; Björn Quast; Rebecca H Chisholm; Kerry A Landman; Leonie M Quinn
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 3.260

Review 6.  A flexible genetic toolkit for arthropod neurogenesis.

Authors:  Angelika Stollewerk
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  The evolution of early neurogenesis.

Authors:  Volker Hartenstein; Angelika Stollewerk
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 12.270

8.  Characterization of twist and snail gene expression during mesoderm and nervous system development in the polychaete annelid Capitella sp. I.

Authors:  Kariena K Dill; Katrin Thamm; Elaine C Seaver
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 2.116

9.  The 'ventral organs' of Pycnogonida (Arthropoda) are neurogenic niches of late embryonic and post-embryonic nervous system development.

Authors:  Georg Brenneis; Gerhard Scholtz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Embryonic neurogenesis in Pseudopallene sp. (Arthropoda, Pycnogonida) includes two subsequent phases with similarities to different arthropod groups.

Authors:  Georg Brenneis; Angelika Stollewerk; Gerhard Scholtz
Journal:  Evodevo       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 2.250

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.