Literature DB >> 14593034

Descriptive survey of non-commercial randomised controlled trials in the United Kingdom, 1980-2002.

Iain Chalmers1, Cath Rounding, Kate Lock.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe the characteristics of randomised controlled trials supported by the main non-commercial sources of funding in the United Kingdom between 1980 and 2002.
DESIGN: Descriptive survey.
SETTING: Randomised controlled trials funded by the Medical Research Council, NHS research and development programme, Department of Health, Chief Scientist Office in Scotland, and medical research charities. PARTICIPANTS: 1464 randomised controlled trials supported by the main non-commercial sources of funding.
RESULTS: Support for randomised controlled trials by the main sources of non-commercial funding in the United Kingdom has fallen in recent years, without any concomitant increase in the sample sizes of these studies. Drug trials in a limited range of health problems have dominated among the studies supported by the Medical Research Council and medical research charities. Until recently, the NHS research and development programme supported randomised controlled trials of various healthcare interventions, in a wide range of health problems, but between 1999 and 2002 many of the subprogrammes that had commissioned trials were discontinued.
CONCLUSIONS: The future of non-commercial randomised controlled trials in the United Kingdom has been threatened by the discontinuation or demise of national and regional NHS research and development programmes. Support also seems to be declining from the Medical Research Council and the medical research charities. It is unclear what the future holds for randomised controlled trials that address issues of no interest to industry but are of great importance to patients and practitioners.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14593034      PMCID: PMC261654          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.327.7422.1017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  8 in total

1.  It's official: evaluative research must become part of routine care in the NHS.

Authors:  I Chalmers
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  A guide to patient-led good controlled trials.

Authors:  I Chalmers
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-08-26       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Relation between agendas of the research community and the research consumer.

Authors:  D Tallon; J Chard; P Dieppe
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-06-10       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Medical research charities should fund more trials.

Authors:  Edzard Ernst; Barbara Wider
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-11-23

5.  Who's afraid of the European clinical trials Directive?

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-06-28       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial.

Authors:  Andrew Molyneux; Richard Kerr; Irene Stratton; Peter Sandercock; Mike Clarke; Julia Shrimpton; Rury Holman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-10-26       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Involving consumers in designing, conducting, and interpreting randomised controlled trials: questionnaire survey.

Authors:  B Hanley; A Truesdale; A King; D Elbourne; I Chalmers
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-03-03

8.  Doctors and patients don't agree: cross sectional study of patients' and doctors' perceptions and assessments of disability in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  P M Rothwell; Z McDowell; C K Wong; P J Dorman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-05-31
  8 in total
  19 in total

1.  Non-commercial randomised clinical trials need money for meetings and travel expenses.

Authors:  Ian H Kunkler
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-12-06

2.  Clinical arithmetic.

Authors:  Colin Currie
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-12-20

3.  Academic medicine: time for reinvention: MRC aims to give NHS evidence from randomised clinical trials.

Authors:  Colin Blakemore; Iain Chalmers
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-03

Review 4.  Resuscitating clinical research in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  John Bell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-11-01

5.  Decline in mortality in children with HIV in the UK and Ireland: argument is flawed.

Authors:  S W P Mhlongo; P M H Maduna
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-02-28

6.  Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.

Authors:  John R Geddes; Andrea Cipriani
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-10-09

7.  Registration of noncommercial randomised clinical trials: the feasibility of using trial registries to monitor the number of trials.

Authors:  James Raftery; Eleanor Fairbank; Lisa Douet; Louise Dent; Alison Price; Ruairidh Milne; Tom Walley
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  The institutional review board is an impediment to human research: the result is more animal-based research.

Authors:  Mark J Rice
Journal:  Philos Ethics Humanit Med       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 2.464

Review 9.  The evidence base for interventions delivered to children in primary care: an overview of cochrane systematic reviews.

Authors:  Peter J Gill; Kay Yee Wang; David Mant; Lisa Hartling; Carl Heneghan; Rafael Perera; Terry Klassen; Anthony Harnden
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Clinical drug trials in general practice: a 10-year overview of protocols.

Authors:  Anja Maria Brænd; Kaspar Buus Jensen; Atle Klovning; Jørund Straand
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.