Literature DB >> 14592933

Mice bearing Acads mutation display altered postingestive but not 5-s orosensory response to dietary fat.

Brenda K Smith Richards1, Brenda N Belton, Barbara York, Julia Volaufova.   

Abstract

A previous survey of mouse inbred strains revealed a wide range in self-selected fat intake, from 26 to 83% of energy. The BALB/cByJ strain selected a lower percentage of fat intake (36%) than all other strains tested except for the CAST/Ei. BALB/cByJ mice are deficient in the short-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (SCAD) enzyme due to a spontaneous mutation in Acads. We hypothesized that this deficiency would alter fat appetite and used three behavioral test paradigms to compare the response of BALB/cByKz. Acads -/- and BALB/cByKz. Acads +/+ mice to fat stimuli. First, during 10-day exposure to a macronutrient self-selection diet, Acads -/- mice consumed proportionately less fat and more carbohydrate than Acads +/+ mice, yet total energy intake was similar between strains. Next, in 48-h two-bottle preference tests, Acads +/+ mice displayed a preference for 50% corn oil, but Acads -/- mice did not. Finally, in brief-access taste tests employing successive 5-s presentations of corn oil in an ascending concentration series ending with 50%, there were no effects of strain on total licks, indicating that Acads does not alter acute orosensory response to this fat stimulus. With 15-s presentations, however, the Acads +/+ mice licked more of the 50% oil than Acads -/-, suggesting orosensory effects related to the increased exposure time. In contrast to corn oil, there were no strain differences in licking response to sucrose solution in either the two-bottle or brief-access taste tests. The observation that SCAD-deficient mice display altered postingestive responses to dietary fat provides further evidence for the metabolic control of feeding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14592933     DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00488.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6119            Impact factor:   3.619


  8 in total

Review 1.  Neural and metabolic regulation of macronutrient intake and selection.

Authors:  Hans-Rudolf Berthoud; Heike Münzberg; Brenda K Richards; Christopher D Morrison
Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 6.297

2.  Greater reductions in fat preferences in CALHM1 than CD36 knockout mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  Transcriptional profiling of chromosome 17 quantitative trait Loci for carbohydrate and total calorie intake in a mouse congenic strain reveals candidate genes and pathways.

Authors:  K Ganesh Kumar; Brenda K Smith Richards
Journal:  J Nutrigenet Nutrigenomics       Date:  2008-01-17

4.  Brain transcriptional responses to high-fat diet in Acads-deficient mice reveal energy sensing pathways.

Authors:  Claudia Kruger; K Ganesh Kumar; Randall L Mynatt; Julia Volaufova; Brenda K Richards
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  High-resolution mapping of a genetic locus regulating preferential carbohydrate intake, total kilocalories, and food volume on mouse chromosome 17.

Authors:  Rodrigo Gularte-Mérida; Lisa M DiCarlo; Ginger Robertson; Jacob Simon; William D Johnson; Claudia Kappen; Juan F Medrano; Brenda K Richards
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Short chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency and short-term high-fat diet perturb mitochondrial energy metabolism and transcriptional control of lipid-handling in liver.

Authors:  Sujoy Ghosh; Claudia Kruger; Shawna Wicks; Jacob Simon; K Ganesh Kumar; William D Johnson; Randall L Mynatt; Robert C Noland; Brenda K Richards
Journal:  Nutr Metab (Lond)       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 4.169

7.  Pro-opiomelanocortin modulates the thermogenic and physical activity responses to high-fat feeding and markedly influences dietary fat preference.

Authors:  Y C Loraine Tung; Debra Rimmington; Stephen O'Rahilly; Anthony P Coll
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 4.736

Review 8.  FGF21 and the Physiological Regulation of Macronutrient Preference.

Authors:  Cristal M Hill; Emily Qualls-Creekmore; Hans-Rudolf Berthoud; Paul Soto; Sangho Yu; David H McDougal; Heike Münzberg; Christopher D Morrison
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 4.736

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.