Literature DB >> 14592568

Estimation of septic tank setback distances based on transport of E. coli and F-RNA phages.

Liping Pang1, Murray Close, Mark Goltz, Lester Sinton, Helen Davies, Carollyn Hall, Greg Stanton.   

Abstract

Setback distances between septic tank systems and the shorelines of Lake Okareka, New Zealand were determined from model simulations for a worst-case scenario, using the highest hydraulic conductivity and gradient measured in the field, removal rates of the microbial indicators (Escherichia coli and F-RNA phages) determined from a column experiment, and maximum values of the design criteria for the disposal system, and assuming an absence of an unsaturated zone, a continuous discharge of the raw effluent from a failed or non-complying treatment system (both indicators at concentrations of 1x10(7) counts/100 ml) into the groundwater and no sorption of pathogens in the aquifer. Modelling results suggest that the minimal setback distances were 16 m to satisfy the New Zealand Recreational Water Quality Guidelines for E. coli <126 per 100 ml (Ministry for the Environment, 1999) and 48 m to meet the Drinking-Water Standards for New Zealand 2000 for enteric virus <1 per 100 l (Ministry of Health, 2000). These distances may be applicable for other lakeshores in pumice sand aquifers with groundwater velocities <7 m/day. Findings of laboratory column and batch experiments provided an insight into the microbial attenuation and transport processes in pumice sand aquifers. Bacterial removal was predominately through filtration (87-88%) and partially by die-off (12-13%), while viral removal was by both die-off (45%) and filtration (55%). In addition, microbial die-off in groundwater without aquifer material (i.e., free microbes) was much lower than die-off in groundwater with aquifer material (i.e., sorbed microbes) and contributed only 2-6% to the total removal. This implies that the setback distances estimated from die-off rates for the free microbes, determined in the laboratory without considering aquifer media and other removal processes, which are often reported in the literature, could be larger than necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14592568     DOI: 10.1016/S0160-4120(03)00054-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  5 in total

1.  Application of a linear regression model to assess the influence of urbanised areas and grazing pastures on the microbiological quality of rural streams.

Authors:  Scott J McGrane; Doerthe Tetzlaff; Chris Soulsby
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Public health performance of sanitation technologies in Tamil Nadu, India: Initial perspectives based on E. coli release.

Authors:  Musa Manga; Pete Kolsky; Jan Willem Rosenboom; Sudha Ramalingam; Lavanya Sriramajayam; Jamie Bartram; Jill Stewart
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 7.401

3.  Predicting the dispersal of SARS-CoV-2 RNA from the wastewater treatment plant to the coast.

Authors:  Peter E Robins; Neil Dickson; Jessica L Kevill; Shelagh K Malham; Andrew C Singer; Richard S Quilliam; Davey L Jones
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-09-07

4.  Torque teno virus: an improved indicator for viral pathogens in drinking waters.

Authors:  Jennifer S Griffin; Jeanine D Plummer; Sharon C Long
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 4.099

5.  Contamination of water resources by pathogenic bacteria.

Authors:  Pramod K Pandey; Philip H Kass; Michelle L Soupir; Sagor Biswas; Vijay P Singh
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 4.126

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.