R P Allen1, M C La Buda, P Becker, C J Earley. 1. Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, A Building 6C, Room 678, 4940 Eastern Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA. richardjhu@aol.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although there is a relatively high rate of occurrence of sporadic cases of restless legs syndrome (RLS), the systematic study of family history of RLS in populations of RLS patients has been very limited. The objective of the present study was to determine the risk of RLS for first- and second-degree relatives of a population of primary RLS patients not selected for the number of affected relatives in their families and to obtain an estimate of the degree of genetic involvement in RLS. METHODS: Consecutively consenting patients from two different sites who met the criteria for RLS completed a worksheet that asked them to indicate their current age, the date of their earliest RLS symptoms, and the names and RLS status of all of their first- and second-degree relatives. Controls with no clinical history of RLS also completed the worksheet. RESULTS: First- and second-degree relatives of patients with RLS had a significantly greater risk of RLS than the first- (P<0.001) and second-degree relatives (P<0.003) of controls. The risk of RLS was found to be greater for first-degree relatives of early-onset, rather than late-onset, RLS probands (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a complete systematic examination of the risk of RLS among relatives of RLS probands and controls using the same assessment methodology. Although the results are consistent with a genetic etiology for RLS, they do not support the presence of one simple, Mendelian-inherited major gene in most RLS families.
BACKGROUND: Although there is a relatively high rate of occurrence of sporadic cases of restless legs syndrome (RLS), the systematic study of family history of RLS in populations of RLS patients has been very limited. The objective of the present study was to determine the risk of RLS for first- and second-degree relatives of a population of primary RLS patients not selected for the number of affected relatives in their families and to obtain an estimate of the degree of genetic involvement in RLS. METHODS: Consecutively consenting patients from two different sites who met the criteria for RLS completed a worksheet that asked them to indicate their current age, the date of their earliest RLS symptoms, and the names and RLS status of all of their first- and second-degree relatives. Controls with no clinical history of RLS also completed the worksheet. RESULTS: First- and second-degree relatives of patients with RLS had a significantly greater risk of RLS than the first- (P<0.001) and second-degree relatives (P<0.003) of controls. The risk of RLS was found to be greater for first-degree relatives of early-onset, rather than late-onset, RLS probands (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a complete systematic examination of the risk of RLS among relatives of RLS probands and controls using the same assessment methodology. Although the results are consistent with a genetic etiology for RLS, they do not support the presence of one simple, Mendelian-inherited major gene in most RLS families.
Authors: Sahil Chawla; Seema Gulyani; Richard P Allen; Christopher J Earley; Xu Li; Peter Van Zijl; Dimitrios Kapogiannis Journal: Sleep Date: 2019-07-08 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Rose A Franco; Ramesh Ashwathnarayan; Arshana Deshpandee; Joshua Knox; Jack Daniel; Daniel Eastwood; Jose Franco; Kia Saeian Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2008-02-15 Impact factor: 4.062