Literature DB >> 1459058

Antimicrobial susceptibility of bacterial isolates from 233 horses with musculoskeletal infection during 1979-1989.

R M Moore1, R K Schneider, J Kowalski, L R Bramlage, L M Mecklenburg, C W Kohn.   

Abstract

Bacterial culture and susceptibility results were analysed from 233 horses with septic arthritis/tenosynovitis or osteomyelitis that developed after fracture repair. Antibiotics were deemed highly effective, effective or ineffective if > or = 85%, 70-84.9% or < 70% of the isolates were susceptible respectively. In total, 424 bacterial types were isolated; 386 were aerobic or facultative and 38 were anaerobic. Enterobacteriaceae (28.8%) were the most common bacterial group isolated, followed by non-beta-haemolytic streptococci (13.0%), coagulase-positive staphylococci (11.8%), beta-haemolytic streptococci (9.4%), and coagulase-negative staphylococci (7.3%). The remainder of the organisms were other Gram-negative (15.8%), other Gram-positive (2.3%) and miscellaneous (2.6%) bacteria. Penicillin and ampicillin were highly effective against beta-haemolytic streptococci, but were ineffective against other bacteria. Ampicillin was no more effective than penicillin against most bacteria. Amikacin was the most effective antibiotic against the wide range of bacteria isolated in this study. Amikacin was highly effective against coagulase-positive staphylococci, Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas and was effective against coagulase-negative staphylococci and Actinobacillus. Gentamycin was not highly effective against any bacterial group; but was effective against coagulase-positive and negative staphylococci, Pseudomonas, Salmonella and Actinobacillus. Kanamycin was ineffective against all bacteria with the exception of Actinobacillus. Cephalothin was highly effective against beta-haemolytic streptococci, coagulase-positive staphylococci and Actinobacillus and was effective against coagulase-negative staphylococci.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1459058     DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1992.tb02875.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Equine Vet J        ISSN: 0425-1644            Impact factor:   2.888


  11 in total

1.  Serum concentrations and pharmacokinetics of enrofloxacin after intravenous and intragastric administration to mares.

Authors:  G R Haines; M P Brown; R R Gronwall; K A Merritt
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.310

2.  Bacterial isolates from equine infections in western Canada (1998-2003).

Authors:  Chris Clark; Sarah Greenwood; Joe O Boison; Manuel Chirino-Trejo; Patricia M Dowling
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  Comparison of Etest, disk diffusion, and broth macrodilution for in vitro susceptibility testing of Rhodococcus equi.

Authors:  Londa J Berghaus; Steeve Giguère; Kristen Guldbech; Eleanor Warner; Ukachi Ugorji; Roy D Berghaus
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Pharmacokinetics of regional limb perfusion using a combination of amikacin and penicillin in standing horses.

Authors:  Roee Dahan; Gil L Oreff; Amos J Tatz; Tal Raz; Malka Britzi; Gal Kelmer
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.008

5.  Evaluation and treatment of an adult quarter horse with an unusual fracture of the humerus and septic arthritis.

Authors:  Colin Mitchell; Christopher B Riley
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.008

6.  Pharmacokinetics of difloxacin and its concentration in body fluids and endometrial tissues of mares after repeated intragastric administration.

Authors:  Aric R Adams; Gregory R Haines; Murray P Brown; Ronald Gronwall; Kelly Merritt
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.310

7.  Pharmacokinetics of orbifloxacin and its concentration in body fluids and in endometrial tissues of mares.

Authors:  G R Haines; M P Brown; R R Gronwall; K A Merritt; L K Baltzley
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.310

8.  Comparison of 2 techniques for regional antibiotic delivery to the equine forelimb: intraosseous perfusion vs. intravenous perfusion.

Authors:  T D Butt; J V Bailey; P M Dowling; P B Fretz
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.008

9.  The influence of perfusate volume on antimicrobial concentration in synovial fluid following intravenous regional limb perfusion in the standing horse.

Authors:  Rosaleen M Hyde; Timothy M Lynch; Carol K Clark; Donnie E Slone; Faith E Hughes
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.008

10.  Temporal Bacteriostatic Effect and Growth Factor Loss in Equine Platelet Components and Plasma Cultured with Methicillin-Sensitive and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A Comparative In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Catalina López; María E Alvarez; Jorge U Carmona
Journal:  Vet Med Int       Date:  2014-11-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.