Literature DB >> 1459006

Flow cytometric determination of atypical antigen expression in acute leukemia for the study of minimal residual disease.

J Drach1, D Drach, H Glassl, C Gattringer, H Huber.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate to which extent acute leukemias could be monitored for residual disease by using atypical antigen combinations as leukemia-related markers. Atypical antigenic features were determined by double color flow cytometry and included coexpression of lymphoid and myeloid related antigens, unphysiological coexpression of immature and mature antigens, and lack of an antigen that is normally expressed during maturation. Atypical immunophenotypes were detected in 35 of 68 patients with AML (51.5%) and 15 of 24 patients with ALL (62.5%). When 12 patients with leukemia-associated markers were again analyzed at relapse, the relevant antigen combinations were retained in 11 of them. The sensitivity of this two color flow cytometric assay as determined in dilution experiments was 1 in 10(3) to 10(4) cells. Follow-up studies of bone marrow samples revealed that, after induction chemotherapy cells with leukemia-associated markers were detectable in several patients at a frequency of 0.5 to 4%, but only patients in whom the cells with atypical antigens never disappeared suffered from relapse. In contrast, patients who became negative for the atypical cells remained in complete remission (median remission duration after the first negative bone marrow assessment by flow cytometry 52 weeks, range 20-102). We conclude that atypical antigen combinations, which are present in a meaningful number of acute leukemias, are a valuable means of monitoring acute leukemia patients during follow-up. This flow cytometric approach can complement other strategies to get a more accurate definition of remission in acute leukemia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1459006     DOI: 10.1002/cyto.990130813

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytometry        ISSN: 0196-4763


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of the effects of Ficoll-Hypaque separation and whole blood lysis on results of immunophenotypic analysis of blood and bone marrow samples from patients with hematologic malignancies.

Authors:  K R Tamul; J L Schmitz; K Kane; J D Folds
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  1995-05

Review 2.  Multi-color flow cytometric immunophenotyping for detection of minimal residual disease in AML: past, present and future.

Authors:  J M Jaso; S A Wang; J L Jorgensen; P Lin
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 5.483

3.  Phenotypic changes in acute myeloid leukaemia: implications in the detection of minimal residual disease.

Authors:  A Macedo; J F San Miguel; M B Vidriales; M C López-Berges; M A García-Marcos; M Gonzalez; C Landolfi; A Orfão
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  How and why minimal residual disease studies are necessary in leukemia: a review from WP10 and WP12 of the European LeukaemiaNet.

Authors:  Marie C Béné; Jaspal S Kaeda
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 9.941

5.  Characterization of aberrant phenotypes in acute myeloblastic leukemia.

Authors:  A Macedo; A Orfão; M B Vidriales; M C López-Berges; B Valverde; M González; M D Caballero; F Ramos; M Martínez; J Fernández-Calvo
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.673

Review 6.  Current Strategies for the Detection of Minimal Residual Disease in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Authors:  Juliana Maria Camargos Rocha; Sandra Guerra Xavier; Marcelo Eduardo de Lima Souza; Juliana Godoy Assumpção; Mitiko Murao; Benigna Maria de Oliveira
Journal:  Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis       Date:  2016-04-10       Impact factor: 2.576

7.  Approach to the Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patient.

Authors:  Valentina Sas; Vlad Moisoiu; Patric Teodorescu; Sebastian Tranca; Laura Pop; Sabina Iluta; Sergiu Pasca; Cristina Blag; Sorin Man; Andrei Roman; Catalin Constantinescu; Ioana Rus; Mihail Buse; Bogdan Fetica; Mirela Marian; Cristina Selicean; Ioana Berindan-Neagoe; Bobe Petrushev; Horia Bumbea; Alina Tanase; Mihnea Zdrenghea; Shigeo Fuji; Shigehisa Kitano; Ciprian Tomuleasa
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Impact of Cell-surface Antigen Expression on Target Engagement and Function of an Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor × c-MET Bispecific Antibody.

Authors:  Stephen W Jarantow; Barbara S Bushey; Jose R Pardinas; Ken Boakye; Eilyn R Lacy; Renouard Sanders; Manuel A Sepulveda; Sheri L Moores; Mark L Chiu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 5.157

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.