BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Bilateral laminotomy has been proposed as an alternative to laminectomy for decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis. Preservation of the posterior midline ligaments with laminotomy is presumed to maintain spinal segment stability. There have been no previous studies that directly compare the amount of destabilization and increase in disc pressures between the two procedures. PURPOSE: To quantify spinal segmental instability caused by bilateral laminotomy and laminectomy, and to compare the central and peripheral intradiscal pressures after the two procedures. STUDY DESIGN/ SETTING: Mechanical testing of the lumbar motion segments of calf spines. METHODS: Nine fresh calf spines were tested under flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation, intact first, then after laminotomy and laminectomy at the level of L4-L5. Four miniature pressure transducers were implanted in the central and peripheral disc at L4-L5 to measure intradiscal pressures. Three-dimensional motion was measured with motion analysis system. RESULTS: Comparing with bilateral laminotomy, laminectomy showed significant increase in segmental motion at the surgical level in flexion (16%, p<.05), extension (14%, p<.04) and right axial rotation (23%, p<.03). In flexion, the stress at the anterior annulus increased a nonsignificant 20% after laminotomy, but significant 130% after laminectomy (p<.02). In the intact spine, the posterolateral annulus experienced the highest stress with lateral bending to the same side when compared with other loading directions. This stress remained unchanged after laminotomy but increased 9% after laminectomy (p<.06). In rotation, axial intradiscal stresses were evenly distributed and unchanged after each procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Laminectomy causes more destabilization of a spinal motion segment than laminotomy and significantly increases disc stress in the anterior annulus.
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Bilateral laminotomy has been proposed as an alternative to laminectomy for decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis. Preservation of the posterior midline ligaments with laminotomy is presumed to maintain spinal segment stability. There have been no previous studies that directly compare the amount of destabilization and increase in disc pressures between the two procedures. PURPOSE: To quantify spinal segmental instability caused by bilateral laminotomy and laminectomy, and to compare the central and peripheral intradiscal pressures after the two procedures. STUDY DESIGN/ SETTING: Mechanical testing of the lumbar motion segments of calf spines. METHODS: Nine fresh calf spines were tested under flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation, intact first, then after laminotomy and laminectomy at the level of L4-L5. Four miniature pressure transducers were implanted in the central and peripheral disc at L4-L5 to measure intradiscal pressures. Three-dimensional motion was measured with motion analysis system. RESULTS: Comparing with bilateral laminotomy, laminectomy showed significant increase in segmental motion at the surgical level in flexion (16%, p<.05), extension (14%, p<.04) and right axial rotation (23%, p<.03). In flexion, the stress at the anterior annulus increased a nonsignificant 20% after laminotomy, but significant 130% after laminectomy (p<.02). In the intact spine, the posterolateral annulus experienced the highest stress with lateral bending to the same side when compared with other loading directions. This stress remained unchanged after laminotomy but increased 9% after laminectomy (p<.06). In rotation, axial intradiscal stresses were evenly distributed and unchanged after each procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Laminectomy causes more destabilization of a spinal motion segment than laminotomy and significantly increases disc stress in the anterior annulus.
Authors: Ralph E Gay; Brice Ilharreborde; Kristin D Zhao; Lawrence J Berglund; Gert Bronfort; Kai-Nan An Journal: Spine J Date: 2007-11-05 Impact factor: 4.166