Literature DB >> 14589250

Cervical myelopathy. current diagnostic and treatment strategies.

Charles C Edwards1, K Daniel Riew, Paul A Anderson, Alan S Hilibrand, Alexander F Vaccaro.   

Abstract

Cervical myelopathy is a varied clinical syndromes resulting from spinal cord dysfunction. Underlying causes are numerous, but spondylosis at one or more levels is the most common etiology. Natural history studies have demonstrated a variable clinical course with gradual neurologic deterioration in a majority of patients. While prospective clinical comparisons are limited, existing literature suggests that operative management reliably arrests the progression of myelopathy and may lead to functional improvement in a majority of patients. The selection of surgical procedures must be carefully individualized based on specific clinical and radiographic factors. Whereas anterior decompression and fusion procedures at one or two motion segments have predictable results, procedures involving three or more levels are associated with increased morbidity. Newer techniques for the treatment of multilevel cervical myelopathy include anterior decompression with 360-degree fusion, hybrid corpectomy/anterior cervical discectomy and fusion techniques and the use of dynamic anterior cervical plates. An alternative technique for patients with a lordotic sagittal alignment is laminoplasty, which has a proven track record of long-term good to excellent results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14589250     DOI: 10.1016/s1529-9430(02)00566-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  54 in total

1.  Effectiveness of multiple-level decompression in laminoplasty and simultaneous C1 laminectomy for patients with cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Junwei Zhang; Shigeru Hirabayashi; Kunio Saiki; Hiroya Sakai
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Surgical approach to cervical spondylotic myelopathy on the basis of radiological patterns of compression: prospective analysis of 129 cases.

Authors:  Mihir R Bapat; Kshitij Chaudhary; Amit Sharma; Vinod Laheri
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Long-term follow-up of clinical and radiological outcome after cervical laminectomy.

Authors:  Sarita van Geest; Anouk M J de Vormer; Mark P Arts; Wilco C Peul; Carmen L A Vleggeert-Lankamp
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Surgical treatment of multilevel cervical spondylosis in patients with or without a history of syringomyelia.

Authors:  Jörg Klekamp
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-02-11       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Anterior approach versus posterior approach for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bin Zhu; Yilan Xu; Xiaoguang Liu; Zhongjun Liu; Gengting Dang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Comparison of anterior approach versus posterior approach for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Jiaquan Luo; Kai Cao; Sheng Huang; Liangping Li; Ting Yu; Cong Cao; Rui Zhong; Ming Gong; Zhiyu Zhou; Xuenong Zou
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Comparison of inter- and intra-observer reliability among the three classification systems for cervical spinal canal stenosis.

Authors:  Sangbong Ko; Wonkee Choi; Seungbum Chae
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Chronic Neck Pain and Cervicogenic Headaches.

Authors:  Frank L. Feng; Jerome Schofferman
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.598

9.  Effect of Surgery on Gait and Sensory Motor Performance in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

Authors:  Kingsley O Abode-Iyamah; Stephanus V Viljoen; Colleen L McHenry; Michael A Petrie; Kirsten E Stoner; Nader S Dahdaleh; Nicole M Grosland; Matthew A Howard; Richard K Shields
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Does the sagittal alignment of the cervical spine have an impact on disk degeneration? Minimum 10-year follow-up of asymptomatic volunteers.

Authors:  Eijiro Okada; Morio Matsumoto; Daisuke Ichihara; Kazuhiro Chiba; Yoshiaki Toyama; Hirokazu Fujiwara; Suketaka Momoshima; Yuji Nishiwaki; Takeshi Hashimoto; Jun Ogawa; Masahiko Watanabe; Takeshi Takahata
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.