Literature DB >> 14588013

Shifts in peptide and protein charge state distributions with varying spray tip orifice diameter in nanoelectrospray Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry.

Yan Li1, Richard B Cole.   

Abstract

The influence of the diameter of the spray tip employed for nano-electrospray mass spectrometry (nano-ES-MS) upon mass spectral charge state distributions was investigated using angiotensin I (M(r) = 1296), insulin (M(r) = 5774), and ubiquitin (M(r) = 8560) as test analytes. Under a variety of experimental conditions, the charge state distributions of the test peptides and protein consistently shifted toward higher values as the tip orifice diameter decreased. This finding indicates that the use of narrow diameter capillaries can promote the formation of higher charge state ions that are more reactive precursors in tandem mass spectrometry experiments. A detailed comparison of charge state distributions obtained for nanospray capillaries of varying diameters was undertaken while systematically varying experimental parameters such as sample flow rate, analyte concentration, solvent composition, and electrospray current. The general tendency to obtain higher charge states from narrow diameter capillaries was conserved throughout, but tips with smaller orifices were more sensitive to sample flow rate (the average charge state was lowered significantly as flow was raised), whereas tips with bigger orifices were more sensitive to analyte concentration and pH of the solution (as each was lowered, the average charge state increased).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14588013     DOI: 10.1021/ac0301402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  17 in total

1.  A study of electrospray ionization emitters with differing geometries with respect to flow rate and electrospray voltage.

Authors:  Brent R Reschke; Aaron T Timperman
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  On the intersection of electrochemistry and mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Lane A Baker; Gargi S Jagdale
Journal:  Curr Opin Electrochem       Date:  2018-12-13

Review 3.  Determination of oxidative protein modifications using mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Mark J Raftery
Journal:  Redox Rep       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 4.412

4.  Rapid online buffer exchange for screening of proteins, protein complexes and cell lysates by native mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Zachary L VanAernum; Florian Busch; Benjamin J Jones; Mengxuan Jia; Zibo Chen; Scott E Boyken; Aniruddha Sahasrabuddhe; David Baker; Vicki H Wysocki
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 13.491

5.  Gas-phase ions of solute species from charged droplets of solutions.

Authors:  Steve Nguyen; John B Fenn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Investigating the role of adducts in protein supercharging with sulfolane.

Authors:  Kevin Aart Douglass; Andre R Venter
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 3.109

7.  What protein charging (and supercharging) reveal about the mechanism of electrospray ionization.

Authors:  Rachel R Ogorzalek Loo; Rajeswari Lakshmanan; Joseph A Loo
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 3.109

8.  Electrothermal supercharging of proteins in native MS: effects of protein isoelectric point, buffer, and nanoESI-emitter tip size.

Authors:  Daniel N Mortensen; Evan R Williams
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 4.616

9.  Increasing charge while preserving noncovalent protein complexes for ESI-MS.

Authors:  Shirley H Lomeli; Sheng Yin; Rachel R Ogorzalek Loo; Joseph A Loo
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 3.109

10.  New reagents for increasing ESI multiple charging of proteins and protein complexes.

Authors:  Shirley H Lomeli; Ivory X Peng; Sheng Yin; Rachel R Ogorzalek Loo; Joseph A Loo
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 3.109

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.