Literature DB >> 14587010

Value of a blood pool contrast agent in MR venography of the lower extremities and pelvis: preliminary results in 12 patients.

Manuela Aschauer1, Hannes A Deutschmann, Rudolf Stollberger, Klaus A Hausegger, Andrea Obernosterer, Helmut Schöllnast, Franz Ebner.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the value of a blood-pool contrast media (NC100150, Nycomed Imaging (now Amersham Health) Oslo, Norway) for evaluation of venous thrombosis of the deep veins of the pelvis and lower extremities. Twelve patients were prospectively evaluated with conventional X-ray venography (XRV) and MR venography (MRV) after injection of NC100150 (2 ml/kg body weight). The source images and 3D maximum intensity projection (MIP) were viewed on an independent workstation. Diagnosis was made in consensus from two radiologists. Diagnostic image quality was achieved in 87 veins with XRV and MRV. As determined by XRV, thrombus was present in 30 out of 87 veins (34.5%). There was agreement concerning absence or presence of thrombi in 83 out of 87 veins (95.4%; kappa = 0.9 +/- 0.05). Compared to XRV, overall sensitivity and specificity of blood-pool MRV were 93.3% and 96.5%, respectively. Two venous thromboses of the popliteal and posterior tibial vein were diagnosed in MRV, but not in XRV. Conversely, two venous thromboses below the knee had been missed by MRV. NC100150 allows prolonged and improved visualization of the peripheral vasculature and may overcome some limitations of gadolinium contrast media. A more complete examination of the proximal venous tree may be possible than with conventional XRV. Arterial and venous enhancement and motion artifacts can limit image interpretation. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14587010     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.10607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  5 in total

1.  3D T(1)-mapping for the characterization of deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Ulrike Blume; James Orbell; Matthew Waltham; Alberto Smith; Reza Razavi; Tobias Schaeffter
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Rapid MR venography in children using a blood pool contrast agent and multi-station fat-water-separated volumetric imaging.

Authors:  Pejman Ghanouni; Shannon G Walters; Shreyas S Vasanawala
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-10-12

3.  Mapping of autogenous saphenous veins as an imaging adjunct to peripheral MR angiography in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease and peripheral bypass grafting: prospective comparison with ultrasound and intraoperative findings.

Authors:  Ann-Marie Bintu Munda Jah-Kabba; Guido Matthias Kukuk; Dariusch Reza Hadizadeh; Frank Träber; Arne Koscielny; Mustapha Sundifu Kabba; Frauke Verrel; Hans Heinz Schild; Winfried Albert Willinek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Comparison Between the Diagnostic Performance of 1.5 T and 3.0 T field Strengths for Detecting Deep Vein Thrombosis Using Magnetic Resonance Black-Blood Thrombus Imaging.

Authors:  Yufeng Ye; Xueping He; Chen Huang; Caiyun Shi; Wei Deng; Wenfeng Luo; Jianke Liang; Zhuonan He; Huan Mao; Qiwei Liang; Dongya Chen; Hanwei Chen; Guoxi Xie
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.389

5.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance black-blood thrombus imaging for the diagnosis of acute deep vein thrombosis at 1.5 Tesla.

Authors:  Hanwei Chen; Xueping He; Guoxi Xie; Jianke Liang; Yufeng Ye; Wei Deng; Zhuonan He; Dexiang Liu; Debiao Li; Xin Liu; Zhaoyang Fan
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 5.364

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.