Literature DB >> 14586719

Interim evidence of the renoprotective effect of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan versus the calcium channel blocker amlodipine in patients with chronic kidney disease and hypertension: a report of the Japanese Losartan Therapy Intended for Global Renal Protection in Hypertensive Patients (JLIGHT) Study.

Yasuhiko Iino1, Matsuhiko Hayashi, Tetsuya Kawamura, Tatsuo Shiigai, Yasuhiko Tomino, Kenichi Yamada, Takeyuki Kitajima, Terukuni Ideura, Akio Koyama, Tetsuzo Sugisaki, Hiromichi Suzuki, Satoshi Umemura, Yoshindo Kawaguchi, Shunya Uchida, Michio Kuwahara, Tsutomu Yamazaki.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Insufficiency of renal function and high blood pressure influence each other and eventually result in life-threatening endstage renal disease. It has been proposed that proteinuria per se is a determinant of the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). The therapeutic strategy for patients with proteinuric CKD and hypertension should therefore be targeted with a view not merely toward blood pressure reduction but also toward renoprotection.
METHODS: We examined the effect of the angiotensin (AT)1 receptor antagonist losartan and the calcium channel blocker amlodipine, throughout a period of 12 months, on reduction of blood pressure and renoprotection. This was done by assessing amounts of urinary protein excretion, serum creatinine (SCr), and creatinine clearance (CCr) in patients with hypertension (systolic blood pressure [SBP] > or = 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure [DBP] > or = 90 mmHg) and CKD (male, body weight [BW] > or = 60 kg: 1.5 < or = SCr < 3.0 mg/dl; female or male BW < 60 kg: 1.3 < or = SCr < 3.0 mg/dl), manifesting proteinuria of 0.5 g or more/day. Losartan was administered once daily at doses of 25 to 100 mg/day, and amlodipine was given once daily at 2.5 to 5 mg/day. No antihypertensive combination therapy was allowed during the first 3-month period.
RESULTS: A 3-month interim analysis revealed that, despite there being no difference in blood pressure between the two groups, there was a significant reduction in 24-h urinary protein excretion in the losartan group ( n = 43), but there was no change in the amlodipine group ( n = 43). Analysis of stratified subgroups with proteinuria of 2 g or more/day and less than 2 g/day showed that losartan lowered proteinuria by approximately 24% in both subgroups, while amlodipine lowered proteinuria by 10%, but only in the subgroup of less than 2 g/day (NS). SCr and CCr did not change throughout the period of 3 months in either group. No severe or fatal adverse event was experienced in either group during the study period.
CONCLUSIONS: Losartan appeared to be efficacious for renoprotection in patients with proteinuric CKD and hypertension, with the mechanism being independent of its antihypertensive action.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14586719     DOI: 10.1007/s10157-003-0241-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol        ISSN: 1342-1751            Impact factor:   2.801


  4 in total

1.  Anti-albuminuric effect of losartan versus amlodipine in hypertensive Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A prospective, open-label, randomized, comparative study.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Ohno; Akiyoshi Nishimura; Hiroshi Iwai; Noriyuki Hirota; Takaaki Yamauchi; Mika Fujimoto; Toshiyuki Miyatake; Hiroshi Arai; Norihiko Aoki
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2007-03

2.  Fifteen years of losartan: what have we learned about losartan that can benefit chronic kidney disease patients?

Authors:  Elizabeth Ripley; Ari Hirsch
Journal:  Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis       Date:  2010-06-28

3.  Efficacy and safety of Shenyankangfu tablets for primary glomerulonephritis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jia Kou; Jie Wu; Hong-tao Yang; Ya-ni He; Jing-ai Fang; Yue-yi Deng; Yuan-sheng Xie; Li-fang Nie; Hong-li Lin; Guang-yan Cai; Xiang-mei Chen
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 4.  Effects of calcium channel blockers comparing to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in patients with hypertension and chronic kidney disease stage 3 to 5 and dialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yen-Chung Lin; Jheng-Wei Lin; Mai-Szu Wu; Kuan-Chou Chen; Chiung-Chi Peng; Yi-No Kang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.