Literature DB >> 14586644

Simulation of tumor-induced angiogenesis and its response to anti-angiogenic drug treatment: mode of drug delivery and clearance rate dependencies.

Daniel Tee1, Joseph DiStefano.   

Abstract

Tumor cells secrete diffusible substances collectively called tumor angiogenic factors (TAFs), most notably vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), which in turn stimulate endothelial cell migration and thus angiogenesis, or new blood vessel formation. Anti-angiogenic drugs for cancer treatment are receiving much attention, with endostatin identified as one of the potent inhibitors. Although the mechanisms of action of endostatin are yet to be fully elucidated, there is evidence that bFGF and endostatin may bind competitively to heparan sulfate proteoglycan receptors on endothelial cells, or endostatin may otherwise downregulate bFGF or VEGF and its receptors, putatively inhibiting cell proliferation. To test these and other hypotheses of inhibitory action that can be similarly formulated, for other TAF inhibitors as well as endostatin, we have developed a mathematical model of extratumoral angiogenesis in cancer in response to specific anti-angiogenic drug treatment. It is built on previous work, a modification and augmentation of published models, and is expressed as four nonlinear partial differential equations, with specific terms for endothelial cell proliferation, degradation, and endostatin-TAF inhibition, and a stochastic, discretized version of this model to represent vessel growth. Our extended model reproduces the simulated kinetics of angiogenesis in a mouse tumor model reported earlier. We assessed the anti-angiogenic kinetic behavior of our extended model by simulating dynamic responses to exogenous endostatin treatment in the same mouse model, using four dosage regimens, two of these reported for in vivo pre-clinical or clinical studies, and two 10 times greater: daily single bolus injections of 20 mg/kg per day and 200 mg/kg per day, and constant infusions of 20 mg/kg per day and 200 mg/kg per day, each for 20 simulated days. We also explored the effects of drug clearance, over an eightfold range of clearance rates that include scaled clearances for endostatin, a sister-drug angiostatin, or similar drugs with clearances in this range. Predictively, our simulation results suggest ineffectiveness of the bolus injection protocols, consistent with in vivo data with angiostatin treatment, whereas simulated constant infusion of endostatin in the mouse model effectively suppresses angiogenesis after only 3 days of treatment, at the lowest dose, over a wide range of drug clearance rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14586644     DOI: 10.1007/s00432-003-0491-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0171-5216            Impact factor:   4.553


  22 in total

1.  Angiogenesis inhibitors revised and revived at AACR. American Association for Cancer Research.

Authors:  Kristine Novak
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 2.  Angiogenesis: potentials for pharmacologic intervention in the treatment of cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and chronic inflammation.

Authors:  A W Griffioen; G Molema
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 25.468

3.  Tumor cell surface heparan sulfate as cryptic promoters or inhibitors of tumor growth and metastasis.

Authors:  Dongfang Liu; Zachary Shriver; Ganesh Venkataraman; Yosuf El Shabrawi; Ram Sasisekharan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Characteristics of indirect pharmacodynamic models and applications to clinical drug responses.

Authors:  A Sharma; W J Jusko
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Two-dimensional models of tumour angiogenesis and anti-angiogenesis strategies.

Authors:  M E Orme; M A Chaplain
Journal:  IMA J Math Appl Med Biol       Date:  1997-09

6.  Tumor growth and neovascularization: an experimental model using the rabbit cornea.

Authors:  M A Gimbrone; R S Cotran; S B Leapman; J Folkman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 7.  Molecular analysis of blood vessel formation and disease.

Authors:  P Carmeliet; D Collen
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1997-11

8.  Structural basis and potential role of heparin/heparan sulfate binding to the angiogenesis inhibitor endostatin.

Authors:  T Sasaki; H Larsson; J Kreuger; M Salmivirta; L Claesson-Welsh; U Lindahl; E Hohenester; R Timpl
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-11-15       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Pharmacokinetics and whole body distribution of elastase derived angiostatin (K1-3) in rats.

Authors:  G Molema; I van Veen-Hof; A M van Loenen-Weemaes; J H Proost; L F de Leij; D K Meijer
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Tissue examination to monitor antiangiogenic therapy: a phase I clinical trial with endostatin.

Authors:  C Mundhenke; J P Thomas; G Wilding; F T Lee; F Kelzc; R Chappell; R Neider; L A Sebree; A Friedl
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 12.531

View more
  2 in total

1.  The dynamics of tumour-vasculature interaction suggests low-dose, time-dense anti-angiogenic schedulings.

Authors:  A d'Onofrio; A Gandolfi; A Rocca
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 6.831

2.  Effects of endostatin on expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors and neovascularization in colonic carcinoma implanted in nude mice.

Authors:  Yun-He Jia; Xin-Shu Dong; Xi-Shan Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 5.742

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.