Literature DB >> 14586382

Impact of ontogeny on linezolid disposition in neonates and infants.

Gregory L Kearns1, Gail L Jungbluth, Susan M Abdel-Rahman, Nancy K Hopkins, Ian R Welshman, Rosie P Grzebyk, Jon B Bruss, John N Van Den Anker.   

Abstract

The impact of age on linezolid disposition during the first few months of life has not been previously investigated. We characterized linezolid pharmacokinetics after a single, 10.0-mg/kg intravenous dose in 42 infants stratified as follows: group 1 (n = 9), gestational age <34 weeks and postnatal age <8 days; group 2 (n = 7), gestational age <34 weeks and postnatal age 8 days to 12 weeks; group 3 (n = 11), gestational age >or=34 weeks and postnatal age <8 days; and group 4 (n = 15), gestational age >or=34 weeks and postnatal age 8 days to 12 weeks. Linezolid was quantitated by a validated HPLC-triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer method from repeated blood samples (n = 7, 0.3 mL each) obtained over a 12-hour period. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by standard model-dependent techniques. The values (mean +/- SD) for total body clearance (CL) (0.25 +/- 0.12 L x h(-1) x kg(-1)), apparent volume of distribution (VD(ss)) (0.75 +/- 0.19 L/kg), and elimination half-life (t(1/2)) (2.8 +/- 2.1 hours) from the entire study cohort were similar to values reported previously for children and adolescents. Examination of the linezolid pharmacokinetics as a function of age revealed that CL increased rapidly during the first week of life and as a function of postnatal age. Age stratification revealed lower values for CL in those infants aged less than 8 days (group 1, 0.12 +/- 0.06 L x h(-1) x kg(-1); group 3, 0.23 +/- 0.12 L x h(-1) x kg(-1)) as compared with those aged 8 days to 12 weeks (group 2, 0.31 +/- 0.07 L x h(-1) x kg(-1); group 4, 0.31 +/- 0.10 L x h(-1) x kg(-1)). In contrast to the results for CL, gestational age served to be the most useful predictor of VD(ss). Evaluation of the pharmacokinetic data would appear to support the use of linezolid dosing regimens currently approved for infants and young children in neonates with postnatal age greater than 7 days.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14586382     DOI: 10.1016/S0009-9236(03)00226-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0009-9236            Impact factor:   6.875


  13 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacological issues of linezolid: an updated critical review.

Authors:  Antonello Di Paolo; Paolo Malacarne; Emanuele Guidotti; Romano Danesi; Mario Del Tacca
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Guidelines on paediatric dosing on the basis of developmental physiology and pharmacokinetic considerations.

Authors:  Imke H Bartelink; Carin M A Rademaker; Alfred F A M Schobben; John N van den Anker
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Pharmacokinetics of linezolid treatment using intravenous and oral administrations in extremely premature infants.

Authors:  Mélanie Sicard; Elise Launay; Jocelyne Caillon; Cédric Jacqueline; Arnaud Legrand; Guillaume Deslandes; Dominique Navas; Jean-Christophe Rozé; Christèle Gras-Le Guen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 4.  Ontogeny of drug elimination by the human kidney.

Authors:  Nancy Chen; Katarina Aleksa; Cindy Woodland; Michael Rieder; Gideon Koren
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 3.714

5.  Use of linezolid in neonatal and pediatric inpatient facilities--results of a retrospective multicenter survey.

Authors:  A Simon; E Müllenborn; M Prelog; W Schenk; J Holzapfel; F Ebinger; A Klabunde-Cherwon; J Faber; A H Groll; K Masjosthusmann; C Dohna-Schwake; K Beutel; E Dirkwinkel; T Lehrnbecher; R A Ammann; A Müller
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Drug labeling and exposure in neonates.

Authors:  Matthew M Laughon; Debbie Avant; Nidhi Tripathi; Christoph P Hornik; Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez; Reese H Clark; P Brian Smith; William Rodriguez
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 16.193

7.  Pediatric anthrax clinical management.

Authors:  John S Bradley; Georgina Peacock; Steven E Krug; William A Bower; Amanda C Cohn; Dana Meaney-Delman; Andrew T Pavia
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 8.  Pharmacokinetics of antibacterial agents in the CSF of children and adolescents.

Authors:  Amanda K Sullins; Susan M Abdel-Rahman
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 9.  Potential implications of DMET ontogeny on the disposition of commonly prescribed drugs in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units.

Authors:  Siavosh Naji-Talakar; Sheena Sharma; Leslie A Martin; Derek Barnhart; Bhagwat Prasad
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 4.481

10.  Factors and Mechanisms for Pharmacokinetic Differences between Pediatric Population and Adults.

Authors:  Eva Fernandez; Raul Perez; Alfredo Hernandez; Pilar Tejada; Marta Arteta; Jose T Ramos
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 6.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.