OBJECTIVE: Polymorphic variants of the human progesterone receptor gene have been described, but their potential influence on in vitro fertilization outcome have not been studied. STUDY DESIGN: DNA was available from 317 women (cases) who had >or=2 embryo transfers without a clinical pregnancy and from 288 women (control subjects) who became pregnant after 1 in vitro fertilization attempt. With protocols that were specific for H770H (C/T genotype) and +331G/A polymorphism, amplification of polymorphism fragments, digestion with restriction enzymes, and gel visualization were performed. RESULTS: Allele frequencies for the 2 variants were 15.5% for H770H T and 4.1% for +331A in cases and 17.9% and 3.6% in control subjects, respectively. Both polymorphisms were rare among non-white subjects. Possession of a H770H T allele was associated with a decreased risk for implantation failure, which was nonsignificant overall but significant in women aged <35 years (adjusted relative risk, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.28, 0.97]). Possession of a +331A allele was associated with an increased risk of implantation failure, which was nonsignificant overall but significant in women who weighed <135 pounds (adjusted relative risk, 3.85 [95% CI, 1.20, 12.30]). The +331G/A polymorphism tended to increase the risk for implantation failure in women with an H770H C/C genotype, but not in women with a C/T or TT genotype (P=.09). Among white women who were H770H C/C, there was a significant trend (P=.03) in the proportion of +331G/A carriers as the number of implantation failures increased, from 8.6% of women with 0 failed attempts to 40% among women with >or=5 failed attempts. CONCLUSION: Although human progesterone receptor polymorphisms do not clearly affect the risk for implantation failure in most women who undergo in vitro fertilization, the likelihood that a woman carries the +331G/A human progesterone receptor polymorphism increases with the number of failed attempts at implantation.
OBJECTIVE: Polymorphic variants of the humanprogesterone receptor gene have been described, but their potential influence on in vitro fertilization outcome have not been studied. STUDY DESIGN: DNA was available from 317 women (cases) who had >or=2 embryo transfers without a clinical pregnancy and from 288 women (control subjects) who became pregnant after 1 in vitro fertilization attempt. With protocols that were specific for H770H (C/T genotype) and +331G/A polymorphism, amplification of polymorphism fragments, digestion with restriction enzymes, and gel visualization were performed. RESULTS: Allele frequencies for the 2 variants were 15.5% for H770H T and 4.1% for +331A in cases and 17.9% and 3.6% in control subjects, respectively. Both polymorphisms were rare among non-white subjects. Possession of a H770H T allele was associated with a decreased risk for implantation failure, which was nonsignificant overall but significant in women aged <35 years (adjusted relative risk, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.28, 0.97]). Possession of a +331A allele was associated with an increased risk of implantation failure, which was nonsignificant overall but significant in women who weighed <135 pounds (adjusted relative risk, 3.85 [95% CI, 1.20, 12.30]). The +331G/A polymorphism tended to increase the risk for implantation failure in women with an H770H C/C genotype, but not in women with a C/T or TT genotype (P=.09). Among white women who were H770H C/C, there was a significant trend (P=.03) in the proportion of +331G/A carriers as the number of implantation failures increased, from 8.6% of women with 0 failed attempts to 40% among women with >or=5 failed attempts. CONCLUSION: Although humanprogesterone receptor polymorphisms do not clearly affect the risk for implantation failure in most women who undergo in vitro fertilization, the likelihood that a woman carries the +331G/Ahumanprogesterone receptor polymorphism increases with the number of failed attempts at implantation.
Authors: Stephan Ellmann; Heinrich Sticht; Falk Thiel; Matthias W Beckmann; Reiner Strick; Pamela L Strissel Journal: Cell Mol Life Sci Date: 2009-03-31 Impact factor: 9.261
Authors: Li Tang; Mary E Platek; Song Yao; Cathee Till; Phyllis J Goodman; Catherine M Tangen; Yue Wu; Elizabeth A Platz; Marian L Neuhouser; Frank Z Stanczyk; Juergen K V Reichardt; Regina M Santella; Ann Hsing; William D Figg; Scott M Lippman; Ian M Thompson; Christine B Ambrosone Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2018-02-09 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: Tracy A Manuck; Yinglei Lai; Paul J Meis; Mitchell P Dombrowski; Baha Sibai; Catherine Y Spong; Dwight J Rouse; Celeste P Durnwald; Steve N Caritis; Ronald J Wapner; Brian M Mercer; Susan M Ramin Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2011-04-08 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Joanne Kotsopoulos; Shelley S Tworoger; Immaculata De Vivo; Immaculata DeVivo; Susan E Hankinson; David J Hunter; Walter C Willett; Wendy Y Chen Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2009-10-01 Impact factor: 7.396