Literature DB >> 14586327

Uterine rupture, perioperative and perinatal morbidity after single-layer and double-layer closure at cesarean delivery.

Celeste Durnwald1, Brian Mercer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to evaluate the risks and benefits of single-layer uterine closure at cesarean delivery on the index and subsequent pregnancy. STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective study of women delivered of their first live-born infants by primary low transverse cesarean delivery (1989-2001) and their subsequent pregnancy at our institution was performed.
RESULTS: Of 768 women studied, 267 had single-layer and 501 had double-layer uterine closures in the index pregnancy. Single-layer closure was associated with slightly decreased blood loss (646 vs 690 mL, P<.01), operative time (46 vs 52 minutes, P<.001), endometritis (13.5% vs 25.5%, P<.001), and postoperative stay (3.5 vs 4.1 days, P<.001). In the second pregnancy, prior single-layer closure was not associated with uterine rupture after a trial of labor (0% vs 1.2%, P=.30), or other maternal or infant morbidities. Prior single-layer closure was associated with increased uterine windows (3.5% vs 0.7%, P=.046) at subsequent cesarean delivery.
CONCLUSION: Single-layer uterine closure is associated with decreased infectious morbidity in the index surgery, but not uterine rupture or other adverse outcomes in the subsequent gestation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14586327     DOI: 10.1067/s0002-9378(03)01056-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  7 in total

1.  Step 6: does not routinely employ practices, procedures unsupported by scientific evidence: the coalition for improving maternity services:.

Authors:  Henci Goer; Mayri Sagady Leslie; Amy Romano
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2007

Review 2.  Techniques for caesarean section.

Authors:  G J Hofmeyr; M Mathai; A Shah; N Novikova
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-01-23

3.  Caesarean section surgical techniques: 3 year follow-up of the CORONIS fractional, factorial, unmasked, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  E Abalos; V Addo; P Brocklehurst; M El Sheikh; B Farrell; S Gray; P Hardy; E Juszczak; J E Mathews; S Naz Masood; E Oyarzun; J Oyieke; J B Sharma; P Spark
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  The CORONIS Trial. International study of caesarean section surgical techniques: a randomised fractional, factorial trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Why do niches develop in Caesarean uterine scars? Hypotheses on the aetiology of niche development.

Authors:  A J M W Vervoort; L B Uittenbogaard; W J K Hehenkamp; H A M Brölmann; B W J Mol; J A F Huirne
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  CORONIS - International study of caesarean section surgical techniques: the follow-up study.

Authors:  Edgardo Abalos; Enrique Oyarzun; Victor Addo; J B Sharma; Jiji Matthews; James Oyieke; Shabeen Naz Masood; Mohamed A El Sheikh; Peter Brocklehurst; Barbara Farrell; Shan Gray; Pollyanna Hardy; Nina Jamieson; Ed Juszczak; Patsy Spark
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Effect of single- and double-layer cesarean section closure on residual myometrial thickness and isthmocele - a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors:  Greg J Marchand; Ahmed Masoud; Alexa King; Stacy Ruther; Giovanna Brazil; Hollie Ulibarri; Julia Parise; Amanda Arroyo; Catherine Coriell; Sydnee Goetz; Ashley Christensen; Katelyn Sainz
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-12-24
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.