Literature DB >> 14585254

Impact of Closed-Loop Stimulation, overdrive pacing, DDDR pacing mode on atrial tachyarrhythmia burden in Brady-Tachy Syndrome. A randomized study.

A Puglisi1, G Altamura, F Capestro, B Castaldi, G Critelli, S Favale, L Pavia, G Pettinati.   

Abstract

AIMS: Atrial overdrive pacing algorithms increase Atrial Pacing Percentage (APP) to reduce Atrial Tachyarrhythmia (AT) recurrences in patients with Brady-Tachy Syndrome (BTS). This study aimed to compare AT burden and APP in BTS patients treated with conventional DDDR pacing, DDD+ overdrive or Closed-Loop Stimulation (CLS). METHODS AND
RESULTS: One hundred and forty-nine BTS patients were included (72 male, mean age 74+/-9), who received a dual chamber pacemaker (Philos DR or Inos 2+CLS, Biotronik GmbH, Berlin, Germany) programmed in DDD at 70min(-1). At 1-month follow-up, DDDR, DDD+ or CLS algorithms were activated according to randomization. Follow-up visits for data collection were performed at 4 and 7 months. Non parametric statistical tests (Kruskal-Wallis H-test, Dunn test, Spearman coefficient) were used to analyse not-normally-distributed samples. At 7 months, AT burden was significantly lower in CLS group (20.3+/-63.1min/day, P<0.01) compared to DDDR (56.0+/-184.0min/day) and DDD+ group (63.1+/-113.8min/day). APP was higher in CLS (89.0+/-13.2%) and in DDD+ group (97.9+/-2.7%) than in DDDR group (71.1+/-26.7%, P<0.001). The correlation found between AT burden and APP was very weak: at 7-month follow-up the Spearman coefficient was -0.29 (P=NS) in CLS, -0.52 (P<0.01) in DDD+, -0.22 (P=NS) in DDDR.
CONCLUSIONS: CLS pacing was associated with a significantly lower AT burden,compared to the other pacing algorithms. Moreover APP was significantly higher in DDD+ and in CLS mode, than in DDDR. APP weakly correlated with AT burden only in DDD+ mode, though the lowest AT burden level was obtained in the CLS group where no significant correlation was found.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14585254     DOI: 10.1016/j.ehj.2003.08.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  5 in total

1.  [The role of cardiac pacing in atrial arrhythmia prevention].

Authors:  G Fröhlig
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2005

Review 2.  Atrial fibrillation: profit from cardiac pacing?

Authors:  A Yang; B Lüderitz; T Lewalter
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2005-03

3.  The usefulness of minimal ventricular pacing and preventive AF algorithms in the treatment of PAF: the 'MinVPace' study.

Authors:  Rick A Veasey; Anita Arya; Nick Freemantle; John Silberbauer; Nikhil R Patel; Guy W Lloyd; A Neil Sulke
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-01-16       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Rate-responsive pacing and atrial high rate episodes in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients: Is low heart rate the key?

Authors:  Mauro Biffi; Antonio D'Onofrio; Carlo Pignalberi; Ennio C Pisanò; Saverio Iacopino; Antonio Curnis; Gaetano Senatore; Alessandro Capucci; Paolo Della Bella; Valeria Calvi; Gabriele Zanotto; Fabrizio Caravati; Giampiero Maglia; Michele Manzo; Matteo Santamaria; Matteo Ziacchi; Fabio Lissoni; Daniele Giacopelli; Alessio Gargaro; Francesco Solimene
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2019-07-07       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 5.  The role of pacing in rhythm control and management of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  John Silberbauer; Neil Sulke
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 1.759

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.