Literature DB >> 14585010

On doing two things at once: III. Confirmation of perfect timesharing when simultaneous tasks are ideomotor compatible.

Anthony G Greenwald1.   

Abstract

A. G. Greenwald and H. G. Shulman (see record 1974-10326-001) found that 2 tasks characterized by ideomotor (IM) compatibility could be perfectly timeshared (i.e., performed simultaneously without mutual interference). The 2 tasks were pronouncing "A" or "B" in response to hearing those letter names, and making a manual left or right response to seeing a left- or right-positioned arrow. M.-C. Lien, R. W. Proctor, and P. A. Allen (2002) did not replicate Greenwald and Shulman's result, and concluded that their finding of perfect timesharing of 2 IM-compatible tasks might not be replicable. In the present research, Experiment 1 replicated Greenwald and Shulman's 1973 finding while also supporting the conclusion that Lien et al's nonreplication was due to their not instructing subjects to make 2 responses simultaneously in their timeshared task. Experiment 2 again replicated the perfect timesharing finding, using an alternative control procedure that mixed manual and vocal tasks in the same block. ((c) 2003 APA, all rights reserved)

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14585010     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.5.859

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  12 in total

1.  Response priming by supraliminal and subliminal action effects.

Authors:  Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-11-22

2.  Is the psychological refractory period effect for ideomotor compatible tasks eliminated by speed-stress instructions?

Authors:  Yun Kyoung Shin; Yang Seok Cho; Mei-Ching Lien; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-05-23

Review 3.  The bottleneck of the psychological refractory period effect involves timing of response initiation rather than response selection.

Authors:  Stuart T Klapp; Dana Maslovat; Richard J Jagacinski
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

4.  Evidence for graded central processing resources in a sequential movement task.

Authors:  Willem B Verwey; Elger L Abrahamse; Elian De Kleine; Marit F L Ruitenberg
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-02-09

5.  How does practice reduce dual-task interference: integration, automatization, or just stage-shortening?

Authors:  Eric Ruthruff; Mark Van Selst; James C Johnston; Roger Remington
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-11-17

6.  Do small dual-task costs reflect ideomotor compatibility or the absence of crosstalk?

Authors:  Kimberly M Halvorson; Eliot Hazeltine
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-10

7.  Ideomotor compatibility enables automatic response selection.

Authors:  François Maquestiaux; Morgan Lyphout-Spitz; Eric Ruthruff; Mahé Arexis
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-08

8.  Partial repetition between action plans delays responses to ideomotor compatible stimuli.

Authors:  Lisa R Fournier; Benjamin P Richardson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-03-19

9.  On the importance of Task 1 and error performance measures in PRP dual-task studies.

Authors:  Tilo Strobach; Anja Schütz; Torsten Schubert
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-07

10.  Role of audiovisual synchrony in driving head orienting responses.

Authors:  Cristy Ho; Rob Gray; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.