Literature DB >> 14584621

Evaluation of performance of dental providers on posterior restorations: does experience matter? A data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach.

M Nicholas Coppola1, Yasar A Ozcan, Russell Bogacki.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to discern what factors affect the longevity of amalgam and of composite restorations by dentists who perform posterior restorations. Data are obtained from the Washington Dental Service and contain 1.5 million patient encounters representing visits to 23,000 providers from January 1993 through 31 December 1999. Analysis of provider performance is estimated through Data Envelopment Analysis. The principal finding is that the most efficient dentists produce posterior restorations that survive almost 5 months (4.6 months) longer than those by inefficient providers (chi2 = 18.98, p < 0.0001). The findings suggest that there is no difference in restoration longevity between amalgam and composite restorations when the restoration is performed by efficient provider.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14584621     DOI: 10.1023/a:1025659822427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  25 in total

1.  Physician benchmarking: measuring variation in practice behavior in treatment of otitis media.

Authors:  Y A Ozcan
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  1998-09

2.  Do restorations made of amalgam outlast those made of resin-based composite?

Authors:  K F Leinfelder
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.634

3.  Ownership and organizational performance. A comparison of technical efficiency across hospital types.

Authors:  Y A Ozcan; R D Luke; C Haksever
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  A longitudinal study of dental restorations.

Authors:  D N Allan
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  1977-08-02       Impact factor: 1.626

5.  Dental fees charged by general practitioners and selected specialists in the United States, 1985. Bureau of Economic and Behavioral Research.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.634

6.  A national study of the efficiency of hospitals in urban markets.

Authors:  Y A Ozcan; R D Luke
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Clinical evaluation of composite and amalgam posterior restorations: one year results.

Authors:  G D Derkson; A S Richardson; R Waldman
Journal:  J Can Dent Assoc       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 1.316

8.  Fracture resistance of teeth restored with onlays of three contemporary tooth-colored resin-bonded restorative materials.

Authors:  P A Brunton; P Cattell; F J Burke; N H Wilson
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.426

9.  The effect of gaps in health insurance on continuity of a regular source of care among preschool-aged children in the United States.

Authors:  M D Kogan; G R Alexander; M A Teitelbaum; B W Jack; M Kotelchuck; G Pappas
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-11-08       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  A 14-year clinical assessment of 12 amalgam alloys.

Authors:  J W Osborne; R D Norman; E N Gale
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 1.677

View more
  4 in total

1.  Determinants of efficiency in reducing child mortality in developing countries. The role of inequality and government effectiveness.

Authors:  Bienvenido Ortega; Jesús Sanjuán; Antonio Casquero
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2016-05-03

2.  Does a new formula have an input in the clinical success of posterior composite restorations? A chat study.

Authors:  Sevil Gurgan; Uzay Koc Vural; Zeynep Bilge Kutuk; Filiz Yalcin Cakir
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Survival characteristics of composite restorations in primary teeth.

Authors:  Katharina Bücher; Isabel Metz; Vinay Pitchika; Reinhard Hickel; Jan Kühnisch
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  A 24-month evaluation of amalgam and resin-based composite restorations: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Authors:  Michael S McCracken; Valeria V Gordan; Mark S Litaker; Ellen Funkhouser; Jeffrey L Fellows; Douglass G Shamp; Vibeke Qvist; Jeffrey S Meral; Gregg H Gilbert
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.634

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.