Literature DB >> 14584618

Current status of the evaluation of information retrieval.

Yuri Kagolovsky1, Jochen R Moehr.   

Abstract

This is the second in the series of the articles on an application of the systems analytic approach to evaluation of information retrieval (IR). In the previous article a historical overview of IR was presented and existing terminological problems associated with IR were identified and discussed. In the presented article the current status of IR evaluation is summarized, and different evaluation approaches are discussed. The Cranfield evaluation model and the most often used relevance-based measures of recall and precision are explained, and their problems are presented. Possible evaluation alternatives to the Cranfield model are discussed, and the case for a systems analytic approach to IR is summarized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14584618     DOI: 10.1023/a:1025603704680

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  3 in total

1.  Information Retrieval Systems.

Authors:  J A Swets
Journal:  Science       Date:  1963-07-19       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Cognitive evaluation of decision making processes and assessment of information technology in medicine.

Authors:  A W Kushniruk; V L Patel
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  1998 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 4.046

3.  Assessment of a computerized patient record system: a cognitive approach to evaluating medical technology.

Authors:  A W Kushniruk; D R Kaufman; V L Patel; Y Lévesque; P Lottin
Journal:  MD Comput       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct
  3 in total
  5 in total

1.  A unified architecture for biomedical search engines based on semantic web technologies.

Authors:  Vahid Jalali; Mohammad Reza Matash Borujerdi
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Personalized online information search and visualization.

Authors:  Dongquan Chen; Helmuth F Orthner; Susan M Sell
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2005-03-14       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 3.  Which resources should be used to identify RCT/CCTs for systematic reviews: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ellen T Crumley; Natasha Wiebe; Kristie Cramer; Terry P Klassen; Lisa Hartling
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Optimizing search strategies to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE.

Authors:  Li Zhang; Isola Ajiferuke; Margaret Sampson
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  An alternative to the hand searching gold standard: validating methodological search filters using relative recall.

Authors:  Margaret Sampson; Li Zhang; Andra Morrison; Nicholas J Barrowman; Tammy J Clifford; Robert W Platt; Terry P Klassen; David Moher
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2006-07-18       Impact factor: 4.615

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.