Literature DB >> 14584060

Anastrozole alone or in combination with tamoxifen versus tamoxifen alone for adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer: results of the ATAC (Arimidex, Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination) trial efficacy and safety update analyses.

M Baum1, A Buzdar, J Cuzick, J Forbes, J Houghton, A Howell, T Sahmoud.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The first analysis of the ATAC (Arimidex, Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination) trial (median follow-up, 33 months) demonstrated that in adjuvant endocrine therapy for postmenopausal patients with early-stage breast cancer, anastrozole was superior to tamoxifen in terms of disease-free survival (DFS), time to recurrence (TTR), and incidence of contralateral breast cancer (CLBC). In the current article, the results of the first efficacy update, based on a median follow-up period of 47 months, are reported along with the results of an updated safety analysis, performed 7 months after the first analysis (median duration of treatment, 36.9 months).
METHODS: DFS, TTR, CLBC incidence, and safety were assessed in the same patient group as in the first analysis of the ATAC trial.
RESULTS: DFS estimates at 4 years remained significantly more favorable (86.9% vs. 84.5%, respectively) for patients receiving anastrozole compared with those receiving tamoxifen (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-0.99; P = 0.03). The benefit generated by anastrozole in terms of DFS was even greater in patients with hormone receptor-positive tumors (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.70-0.96; P = 0.014). The HR for TTR also indicated a significant benefit for patients receiving anastrozole compared with those receiving tamoxifen (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71-0.96; P = 0.015), with additional benefit for patients with hormone receptor-positive tumors (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.65-0.93; P = 0.007). CLBC incidence data also continued to favor anastrozole (odds ratio [OR], 0.62; 95% CI, 0.38-1.02; P = 0.062), and statistical significance was achieved in the hormone receptor-positive subgroup (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.32-0.98; P = 0.042). The updated safety analysis also confirmed the findings of the first analysis, in that endometrial cancer (P = 0.007), vaginal bleeding and discharge (P < 0.001 for both), cerebrovascular events (P < 0.001), venous thromboembolic events (P < 0.001), and hot flashes (P < 0.001) all occurred less frequently in the anastrozole group, whereas musculoskeletal disorders and fractures (P < 0.001 for both) continued to occur less frequently in the tamoxifen group. These results indicated that the safety profile of anastrozole remained consistent.
CONCLUSIONS: After an additional follow-up period, anastrozole continues to show superior efficacy, which is most apparent in the clinically relevant hormone receptor-positive population. Furthermore, anastrozole has numerous noteworthy advantages in terms of tolerability compared with tamoxifen. These findings suggest that the benefits of anastrozole are likely to be maintained in the long term and provide further support for the status of anastrozole as a valid treatment option for postmenopausal women with hormone-sensitive early-stage breast cancer. Copyright 2003 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14584060     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  165 in total

Review 1.  Aromatase, breast cancer and obesity: a complex interaction.

Authors:  Serdar E Bulun; Dong Chen; Irene Moy; David C Brooks; Hong Zhao
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 12.015

2.  AIs: implications for fractures in perimenopausal women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Beatrice J Edwards; Athena Samaras; June M McKoy; Simone Boyle; Charles L Bennett
Journal:  Community Oncol       Date:  2008-11-01

Review 3.  Early breast cancer.

Authors:  Tomoyoshi Suzuki; Masakazu Toi; Shigehira Saji; Kazumi Horiguchi; Tomoyuki Aruga; Eiji Suzuki; Shinichiro Horiguchi; Nobuaki Funata; Katsuyuki Karasawa; Noriko Kamata
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  Putting the cardiovascular safety of aromatase inhibitors in patients with early breast cancer into perspective: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Muhammad Younus; Michelle Kissner; Lester Reich; Nicola Wallis
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Social network analysis of physician interactions: the effect of institutional boundaries on breast cancer care.

Authors:  Will Bridewell; Amar K Das
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2011-10-22

6.  Prevention, diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis following menopause induced due to oncological disease.

Authors:  Sonia Baldi; Angelamaria Becorpi
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2009-09

Review 7.  Cardiovascular safety profiles of aromatase inhibitors : a comparative review.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Nabholtz; Joseph Gligorov
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  An association between a common variant (G972R) in the IRS-1 gene and sex hormone levels in post-menopausal breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Jing Fan; Roberta McKean-Cowdin; Leslie Bernstein; Frank Z Stanczyk; Arthur Xuejun Li; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Anne McTiernan; Richard Baumgartner; Frank Gilliland
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 9.  Second malignancies after breast cancer: The impact of adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Chunhui Dong; Ling Chen
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-02-03

Review 10.  Estrogen receptor modulators and down regulators: optimal use in postmenopausal women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Christa K Baumann; Monica Castiglione-Gertsch
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.