Literature DB >> 14584029

Larval development of Myzostoma cirriferum (Myzostomida).

Igor Eeckhaut1, Laurence Fievez, Monika C M Müller.   

Abstract

The larval development of Myzostoma cirriferum is described by means of SEM, TEM, and cLSM. It is similar to that of other myzostomids and includes three stages: the protrochophore, the trochophore, and the metatrochophore. The protrochophore is a ball-shaped larva present in culture from 18-48 h after egg laying. It has no internal organs and its body is made of three cell types: covering cells and ciliated cells that are external and surrounded by a cuticle, and resting cells that fill the blastocoel. The trochophore is a pear-shaped larva that develops 20-72 h after egg laying; the body includes the same three cell types as the previous stage. The metatrochophore is a pear-shaped larva that develops between 40 h and 14 days and is characterized by the presence of two bundles of four chaetae. When fully developed, the metatrochophore has a digestive system (made of a pharynx, an esophagus, and a blind digestive pouch), two pairs of protonephridia, and a nervous system composed of a supraesophageal ganglion, circumesophageal connectives, and dorsal and ventral nerves. Metamorphosis generally occurs 7 days after egg laying. At that time, the metatrochophore loses its chaetae and becomes pleated ventrally. This ultrastructural analysis suggests that chaetae and the five ventral longitudinal nerve cords of M. cirriferum metatrochophores are homologous structures to those observed in some polychaete trochophores. Coupled with recent phylogenetic analyses, where the Myzostomida are placed outside the Annelida, homologies between myzostomid and polychaete larvae support the view that a trochophore appeared early during the spiralian evolution. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14584029     DOI: 10.1002/jmor.10160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Morphol        ISSN: 0022-2887            Impact factor:   1.804


  7 in total

1.  Phylogenomic analyses unravel annelid evolution.

Authors:  Torsten H Struck; Christiane Paul; Natascha Hill; Stefanie Hartmann; Christoph Hösel; Michael Kube; Bernhard Lieb; Achim Meyer; Ralph Tiedemann; Günter Purschke; Christoph Bleidorn
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The molecular symplesiomorphies shared by the stem groups of metazoan evolution: can sites as few as 1% have a significant impact on recognizing the phylogenetic position of myzostomida?

Authors:  Yanhui Wang; Qiang Xie
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Nervous and muscle system development in Phascolion strombus (Sipuncula).

Authors:  Andreas Wanninger; Demian Koop; Lindell Bromham; Erin Noonan; Bernard M Degnan
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 0.900

4.  Phylogeny of Annelida (Lophotrochozoa): total-evidence analysis of morphology and six genes.

Authors:  Jan Zrzavý; Pavel Ríha; Lubomír Piálek; Jan Janouskovec
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 3.260

5.  The development of the larval nervous system, musculature and ciliary bands of Pomatoceros lamarckii (Annelida): heterochrony in polychaetes.

Authors:  Carmel McDougall; Wei-Chung Chen; Sebastian M Shimeld; David E K Ferrier
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 3.172

6.  On the phylogenetic position of Myzostomida: can 77 genes get it wrong?

Authors:  Christoph Bleidorn; Lars Podsiadlowski; Min Zhong; Igor Eeckhaut; Stefanie Hartmann; Kenneth M Halanych; Ralph Tiedemann
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Annelid phylogeny and the status of Sipuncula and Echiura.

Authors:  Torsten H Struck; Nancy Schult; Tiffany Kusen; Emily Hickman; Christoph Bleidorn; Damhnait McHugh; Kenneth M Halanych
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 3.260

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.