Literature DB >> 14583859

Coevolution in variable mutualisms.

Richard Gomulkiewicz1, Scott L Nuismer, John N Thompson.   

Abstract

Many mutualistic interactions are probably not mutualistic across all populations and years. This article explores consequences of this observation with a series of genetic models that consider how variable mutualisms coevolve. The first models, previously introduced in a general coevolutionary context, consider two coevolving species whose fitness interactions change between beneficial and antagonistic in response to independent spatial or temporal variation in the abiotic or biotic environment. The results demonstrate that both temporal and spatial variability in fitness interactions can cause partner species with tightly matched traits favored by unconditional mutualisms to be vulnerable to evolutionary invasion by alternative types. A new model presented here shows that an additional mutualistic species can have a similar effect and can even cause fitness interactions between the other two species to evolve. Under some conditions, the pairwise interactions can change unidirectionally from mutualistic to antagonistic, with virtually no evolutionary change in either partner species. In other cases, fitness interactions between the species pair can oscillate between mutualism and antagonism as a result of coevolution in the third species. Taken as a whole, these theoretical results suggest that many features of mutualistic coevolution can best be understood by considering spatial, temporal, and community-dependent patterns of fitness interactions.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14583859     DOI: 10.1086/378705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  12 in total

1.  Context dependence in the coevolution of plant and rhizobial mutualists.

Authors:  Katy D Heath; Peter Tiffin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Ant species confer different partner benefits on two neotropical myrmecophytes.

Authors:  Megan E Frederickson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-02-12       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Supply determines demand: influence of partner quality and quantity on the interactions between bats and pitcher plants.

Authors:  Caroline R Schöner; Michael G Schöner; Gerald Kerth; T Ulmar Grafe
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Gene flow and metacommunity arrangement affects coevolutionary dynamics at the mutualism-antagonism interface.

Authors:  Paula Lemos-Costa; Ayana B Martins; John N Thompson; Marcus A M de Aguiar
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Sequence analysis and characterization of plasmid pLK39 isolated from endophytic Salmonella sp. isolated from Solanum lycocarpum.

Authors:  Pericles Lopes Dourado; Vera Lúcia Cardoso; Alexandre Siqueira Guedes Coelho; Luiz Artur Mendes Bataus
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-03       Impact factor: 2.188

6.  From metabolism to ecology: cross-feeding interactions shape the balance between polymicrobial conflict and mutualism.

Authors:  Sylvie Estrela; Christopher H Trisos; Sam P Brown
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  Fern-associated arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi are represented by multiple Glomus spp.: do environmental factors influence partner identity?

Authors:  Brittany West; Jessica Brandt; Kay Holstien; April Hill; Malcolm Hill
Journal:  Mycorrhiza       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 3.387

8.  Housekeeping mutualisms: do more symbionts facilitate host performance?

Authors:  Adrian C Stier; Michael A Gil; C Seabird McKeon; Sarah Lemer; Matthieu Leray; Suzanne C Mills; Craig W Osenberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Asymmetric interaction and indeterminate fitness correlation between cooperative partners in the fig-fig wasp mutualism.

Authors:  Rui-Wu Wang; Bao-Fa Sun; Qi Zheng; Lei Shi; Lixing Zhu
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Expression and evolutionary divergence of the non-conventional olfactory receptor in four species of fig wasp associated with one species of fig.

Authors:  Bin Lu; Nina Wang; Jinhua Xiao; Yongyu Xu; Robert W Murphy; Dawei Huang
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.