Literature DB >> 14583473

Shc proteins are strong, independent prognostic markers for both node-negative and node-positive primary breast cancer.

Pamela A Davol1, Robert Bagdasaryan, Gerald J Elfenbein, Abby L Maizel, A Raymond Frackelton.   

Abstract

Activated Shc signaling proteins are implicated in many pathways associated with aggressive disease, and many breast cancer cell lines derived from highly aggressive tumors contain high levels of activated, tyrosine phosphorylated (PY)-Shc (the M(r) 46000 and M(r) 52000 isoforms) relative to levels of an inhibitory M(r) 66000 Shc isoform. It was, therefore, hypothesized that high amounts of PY-Shc relative to the M(r) 66000 Shc isoform would serve as a marker for aggressive neoplasms. Semiquantitative immunohistochemical analyses of PY-Shc and p66 Shc were performed on archival primary breast tumor specimens from 116 women, 17 of whom experienced relapse (6.1 years median follow-up of nonrelapsed patients). Consistent with our hypothesis, staining intensities demonstrated that increased amounts of PY-Shc (P = 0.01) and decreased expression of p66-Shc protein (P = 0.028) correlated with disease recurrence. Modeled as the ratio of PY-Shc to p66 Shc, the Shc ratio correlated strongly with nodal status (P = 0.003), tumor stage (P = 0.0025), and disease stage (P = 0.002) and was 2-fold higher in primary tumors of patients who subsequently relapsed (P < 0.001). Univariate Cox proportional hazards analysis of relapse-free survival demonstrated the prognostic value of PY-Shc (P = 0.01), p66 Shc (P = 0.04), and the Shc ratio (P = 0.004) as continuous variables, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 10 (P = 0.007) for the Shc ratio. Shc ratio cut points of <0.35 and >0.65 were identified and independently validated to maximize negative predictive value and positive predictive value. Patients with low Shc ratios (n = 36) had a 0.08 HR of relapse (P = 0.007) compared with patients with high Shc ratios, experiencing an 8-year cumulative 2.9% and 55% relapse hazard, respectively, compared with a 22% relapse hazard in the total cohort. The Shc ratio had similar prognostic value for disease-specific survival. In multivariate models, the Shc ratio, both as a continuous variable and as a cut point-categorized variable, was independent of all measured covariates (including nodal status, tumor stage, disease stage, grade, estrogen receptor status, and adjuvant therapy) and was a stronger prognostic marker than all but nodal status. All relapsed node-positive patients had very high Shc ratios (>0.80; P = 0.006) in their primary tumors. Furthermore, the Shc ratio was a strong, independent prognostic indicator in node-negative patients (79 patients, 10 recurrences), with a HR of 0.086 (P = 0.02) that was independent of clinical markers and adjuvant therapy. Patients with low and high Shc ratios experienced a 3.6% and 64% relapse hazard, respectively, compared with 20% in the total node-negative cohort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14583473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  31 in total

1.  Receptor tyrosine kinase signaling favors a protumorigenic state in breast cancer cells by inhibiting the adaptive immune response.

Authors:  Josie Ursini-Siegel; Sean Cory; Dongmei Zuo; William R Hardy; Elton Rexhepaj; Sonya Lam; Babette Schade; Karin Jirstrom; Eva Bjur; Ciriaco A Piccirillo; David Denardo; Lisa M Coussens; Donal J Brennan; William M Gallagher; Morag Park; Tony Pawson; Michael Hallett; William J Muller
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Shc and the mechanotransduction of cellular anchorage and metastasis.

Authors:  Lance S Terada
Journal:  Small GTPases       Date:  2017-02-21

3.  p66Shc longevity protein regulates the proliferation of human ovarian cancer cells.

Authors:  Sakthivel Muniyan; Yu-Wei Chou; Te-Jung Tsai; Paul Thomes; Suresh Veeramani; Benedict B Benigno; L DeEtte Walker; John F McDonald; Shafiq A Khan; Fen-Fen Lin; Subodh M Lele; Ming-Fong Lin
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 4.784

4.  Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of interpretation of immunohistochemical stains of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sara Jonmarker Jaraj; Philippe Camparo; Helen Boyle; François Germain; Bo Nilsson; Fredrik Petersson; Lars Egevad
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  The adaptor proteins p66Shc and Grb2 regulate the activation of the GTPases ARF1 and ARF6 in invasive breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Eric Haines; Caroline Saucier; Audrey Claing
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 6.  Chromosome 1q21 amplification and oncogenes in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Leilei Chen; Tim Hon Man Chan; Xin-yuan Guan
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 6.150

7.  Pilot study on the effects of dietary conjugated linoleic acid on tumorigenesis and gene expression in PyMT transgenic mice.

Authors:  Margaret Flowers; Joyce A Schroeder; Alexander D Borowsky; David G Besselsen; Cynthia A Thomson; Ritu Pandey; Patricia A Thompson
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2010-07-11       Impact factor: 4.944

8.  Interaction with Shc prevents aberrant Erk activation in the absence of extracellular stimuli.

Authors:  Kin Man Suen; Chi-Chuan Lin; Roger George; Fernando A Melo; Eleanor R Biggs; Zamal Ahmed; Melanie N Drake; Swathi Arur; Stefan T Arold; John E Ladbury
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2013-04-14       Impact factor: 15.369

9.  Serial analysis of gene expression reveals differential expression between endometriosis and normal endometrium. Possible roles for AXL and SHC1 in the pathogenesis of endometriosis.

Authors:  Hiroshi Honda; Fermin F Barrueto; Jean Gogusev; Dwight D Im; Patrice J Morin
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 5.211

10.  ShcA signalling is essential for tumour progression in mouse models of human breast cancer.

Authors:  Josie Ursini-Siegel; W Rod Hardy; Dongmei Zuo; Sonya H L Lam; Virginie Sanguin-Gendreau; Robert D Cardiff; Tony Pawson; William J Muller
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 11.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.