Literature DB >> 14582613

Comparative locomotory behavior of T lymphocytes versus T lymphoma cells on flat and grooved surfaces.

A Prina Mello1, Y Volkov, D Kelleher, P J Prendergast.   

Abstract

Locomotion is a characteristic of many cell types, including malignant cells. It is driven by a combination of interacting factors, one of which is recognized to be the surface microtopography. In this study, an in vitro analysis of cell migration was carried out to observe and quantify the differences in locomotion of two types of lymphoid cell on both flat and grooved surfaces. The cells studied were peripheral blood T lymphocytes (PBTL) and a malignant T lymphoma cell line (HUT78). It was found that, on the grooved pattern, the lymphoma HUT78 cells were more diffusive in their migration than the T lymphocyte PBTL cells whereas, on the flat surface, the T lymphocyte PBTL cells had a more diffusive response than the T lymphoma HUT78 cells. It was also found that malignant T lymphoma cells are significantly slower and less diffusive when exposed to a plane substrate than when subjected to a grooved substrate. On the contrary, PBTL cells showed only a moderate drop in cell speed and diffusion on the grooved compared to the flat substrate. PBTL cells did, however, show a general alignment to the direction of the grooves whereas HUT78 did not. Therefore, we have found that the surface topography can influence the motile response of the two different T cell types in different ways, and this can be quantified in terms of motility parameters. This difference may have exploitable applications for cell sorting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14582613     DOI: 10.1114/1.1603261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  8 in total

1.  Endothelial cell alignment on cyclically-stretched silicone surfaces.

Authors:  M Moretti; A Prina-Mello; A J Reid; V Barron; P J Prendergast
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  A year in the land of saints and scholars.

Authors:  C L Vaughan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2004 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 3.  Extracellular matrix elasticity and topography: material-based cues that affect cell function via conserved mechanisms.

Authors:  Isaac A Janson; Andrew J Putnam
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 4.396

Review 4.  Matrix nanotopography as a regulator of cell function.

Authors:  Deok-Ho Kim; Paolo P Provenzano; Chris L Smith; Andre Levchenko
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 10.539

Review 5.  The Regulation of Cellular Responses to Mechanical Cues by Rho GTPases.

Authors:  Jing Ling Hoon; Mei Hua Tan; Cheng-Gee Koh
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 6.600

6.  Influence of biologically inspired nanometer surface roughness on antigen-antibody interactions for immunoassay-biosensor applications.

Authors:  Paul V Tuttle; Ann E Rundell; Thomas J Webster
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2006

7.  Biophysical Regulation of Cell Behavior-Cross Talk between Substrate Stiffness and Nanotopography.

Authors:  Yong Yang; Kai Wang; Xiaosong Gu; Kam W Leong
Journal:  Engineering (Beijing)       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 7.553

Review 8.  Cellular and Subcellular Contact Guidance on Microfabricated Substrates.

Authors:  Claire Leclech; Catherine Villard
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-10-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.