Literature DB >> 14581917

Nonoccupational postexposure HIV prevention: emergency physicians' current practices, attitudes, and beliefs.

Julie B McCausland1, Judith A Linden, Linda C Degutis, Prasanthi Ramanujam, Lisa M Sullivan, Gail D'onofrio.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: We surveyed emergency physicians to determine current practices, knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs regarding nonoccupational postexposure prevention practices.
METHODS: Two thousand randomly selected practicing emergency physicians from the American College of Emergency Physicians' national database and all graduating emergency medicine residents in 2000 were surveyed. Knowledge, role responsibility, self-efficacy, and attitudes and beliefs were measured and composite scores developed. Differences in responses between supporters and nonsupporters were compared for each category.
RESULTS: Eight hundred eighty-nine responded, representing 60% (67/113) of emergency medicine residencies, 32% (347/1095) of emergency medicine residents, and 27% (542/2000) of emergency physicians. Responders recommend nonoccupational postexposure prevention for sexual assault (35%), unintentional needle stick (25%), and, rarely (<15%), for unsafe sexual practices and injection drug use. Knowledge of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations or the time when treatment may be most beneficial is poor (15.5% and 13.7%, respectively). Most agree their role includes providing nonoccupational postexposure prevention drugs and referring patients for counseling (76.5% and 75.6%, respectively). Confidence in assessing need for nonoccupational postexposure prevention varied with exposure type (sexual assault [61.6%], unintentional needle stick [54.8%], unsafe sexual practices [40.4%], and injection drug use [49.7%]). Supporters of nonoccupational postexposure prevention (64.1%) are more likely to have nonoccupational postexposure prevention available (69.3% versus 42.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 19.7 to 33.1), written protocols (42.5% versus 33.0%; 95% CI 2.8 to 16.2), and higher mean composite scores than nonsupporters in all categories: knowledge, self-efficacy, role responsibility, and attitudes.
CONCLUSION: Most emergency physicians surveyed agree that offering nonoccupational postexposure prevention is feasible and within their role responsibility. Establishing nonoccupational postexposure prevention protocols and providing educational programs are important first steps in changing practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14581917     DOI: 10.1016/S019606440300338X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  2 in total

1.  HIV medical providers' perceptions of the use of antiretroviral therapy as nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis in 2 major metropolitan areas.

Authors:  Allan E Rodríguez; Amanda D Castel; Carrigan L Parish; Sarah Willis; Daniel J Feaster; Michael Kharfen; Gabriel A Cardenas; Kira Villamizar; Michael Kolber; Liliana Vázquez-Rivera; Lisa R Metsch
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.731

2.  Predictors of the initiation of HIV postexposure prophylaxis in Rhode Island emergency departments.

Authors:  Roland C Merchant; Kenneth H Mayer; Bruce M Becker; Allison K Delong; Joseph W Hogan
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.078

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.