Literature DB >> 14581764

Influence of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and CT/MRI on the clinical management of patients with gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors: an analysis in 188 patients.

Martin Gotthardt1, Larissa M Dirkmorfeld, Matthias U Wied, Anja Rinke, Martin P Béhé, Anja Schlieck, Helmut Höffken, Heiko Alfke, Klaus Joseph, Klaus J Klose, Thomas M Behr, Rudolph Arnold.   

Abstract

AIM: Many studies describe the sensitivities and specificities of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) in patients with gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (GNT). We performed a study to evaluate the influence of these techniques on the therapeutic management of patients with advanced stages of GNT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The results of either CT/MRI scans or SRS were reviewed by two independent observers who decided on the therapy of a patient. They then had to determine whether the results of the complementary imaging modality would change the decision. The study design was a matched cross-over study with two groups matching in respect to tumor type, imaging modality known first to the observer, and number of patients. For further analysis, patients were divided into three subgroups dependent on tumor stage (group 1, without metastases, group 2, liver metastases, group 3, recurrent disease/extrahepatic metastases).
RESULTS: 188 patients were included into the study. If SRS was known to the observers first, CT/MRI changed the therapeutic management in 16.2, 13.9 and 11.4% of the patients (subgroups 1-3). SRS changed the therapeutic management in 13.5, 12.5 and 10.3%. Overall, CT/MRI would have changed the management in 13.3% and SRS in 11.7% of the patients.
CONCLUSION: Though the patients studied mainly suffered from already advanced stages of the disease, all imaging techniques change the therapeutic management to a comparable extent. Our results support the importance of combined imaging in the management of patients with GNT. Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14581764     DOI: 10.1159/000074519

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Digestion        ISSN: 0012-2823            Impact factor:   3.216


  6 in total

1.  Value of image fusion using single photon emission computed tomography with integrated low dose computed tomography in comparison with a retrospective voxel-based method in neuroendocrine tumours.

Authors:  H Amthauer; T Denecke; T Rohlfing; J Ruf; M Böhmig; M Gutberlet; U Plöckinger; R Felix; A J Lemke
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-12-31       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Multimodal management of neuroendocrine liver metastases.

Authors:  Andrea Frilling; Georgios C Sotiropoulos; Jun Li; Oskar Kornasiewicz; Ursula Plöckinger
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 3.  Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Small Bowel and Pancreas.

Authors:  Ashley Kieran Clift; Mark Kidd; Lisa Bodei; Christos Toumpanakis; Richard P Baum; Kjell Oberg; Irvin M Modlin; Andrea Frilling
Journal:  Neuroendocrinology       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 5.135

Review 4.  Unusual Sites of High-Grade Neuroendocrine Carcinomas: A Case Series and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Watson; Yasar Ahmed; Sarah Picardo; Sonya Chew; Shona Cobbe; Cillian Mahony; James Crotty; Fintan Wallis; Martin J Shelly; Patrick Kiely; Olu Bunmi Ipadeola; Vourneen Healy; Nemer Osman; Rajnish K Gupta
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2018-06-19

5.  Advanced small-cell colon carcinoma: a case report.

Authors:  Toshiaki Iwase; Yoshinori Masuda; Takayuki Suzuki; Osamu Takahashi; Masaru Miyazaki
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2013-03-18

Review 6.  Imaging of gastrinomas by nuclear medicine methods.

Authors:  Martin Béhé; Martin Gotthardt; Thomas M Behr
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.275

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.