Literature DB >> 14581422

F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the evaluation of distant metastases from renal cell carcinoma.

Navneet S Majhail1, Jean-Luc Urbain, Justin M Albani, Mangesh H Kanvinde, Thomas W Rice, Andrew C Novick, Tarek M Mekhail, Thomas E Olencki, Paul Elson, Ronald M Bukowski.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We conducted a study to evaluate the role of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in the detection of distant metastases from renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients with histologically proven clear-cell RCC undergoing surgical evaluation for possible resection of recurrent disease were investigated. All patients had suspected distant metastases based on conventional anatomic imaging techniques (computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging). A total of 36 distant metastatic sites were identified. Pathology for all sites was obtained by biopsy or after surgical resection.
RESULTS: Histologically documented distant metastases from RCC were present in 33 sites (21 patients). Overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of FDG-PET for the detection of distant metastases from RCC was 63.6% (21 of 33), 100% (three of three), and 100% (21 of 21), respectively. The mean size of distant metastases in patients with true-positive FDG-PET was 2.2 cm (95% CI, 1.7 to 2.6 cm) compared with 1.0 cm in patients with false-negative FDG-PET (95% CI, 0.7 to 1.4 cm; P =.001).
CONCLUSION: FDG-PET is not a sensitive imaging modality for the evaluation of metastatic RCC and may not adequately characterize small metastatic lesions. However, positive FDG-PET is predictive for the presence of RCC in lesions imaged, may complement anatomic radiologic imaging modalities, and may alleviate the need for a biopsy in selected situations. A negative FDG-PET, however does not rule out active malignancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14581422     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  51 in total

Review 1.  Imaging of advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Ullrich G Mueller-Lisse; Ulrike L Mueller-Lisse
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Evaluation of treatment response in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: role of state-of-the-art cross-sectional imaging.

Authors:  Venkata S Katabathina; Nathalie Lassau; Ivan Pedrosa; Chaan S Ng; Srinivasa R Prasad
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Pancreatic metastases from renal cell carcinoma: the state of the art.

Authors:  Roberto Ballarin; Mario Spaggiari; Nicola Cautero; Nicola De Ruvo; Roberto Montalti; Cristina Longo; Anna Pecchi; Patrizia Giacobazzi; Giuseppina De Marco; Giuseppe D'Amico; Giorgio Enrico Gerunda; Fabrizio Di Benedetto
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Usefulness of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the evaluation of tumor cardiac thrombus from renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  José R García; Marc Simo; Marina Huguet; Montserrat Ysamat; Francisco Lomeña
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  Demonstration of metastatic tumour growth following vessel structures by PET/CT.

Authors:  Akram Al-Ibraheem; Ambros Beer; Andreas Buck; Markus Schwaiger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  Role of Positron Emission Tomography Imaging in Metabolically Active Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Vidhya Karivedu; Amit L Jain; Thomas J Eluvathingal; Abhinav Sidana
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 7.  Advances in medical imaging for the diagnosis and management of common genitourinary cancers.

Authors:  Mohammad H Bagheri; Mark A Ahlman; Liza Lindenberg; Baris Turkbey; Jeffrey Lin; Ali Cahid Civelek; Ashkan A Malayeri; Piyush K Agarwal; Peter L Choyke; Les R Folio; Andrea B Apolo
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 8.  Targeted therapies in renal cell cancer: recent developments in imaging.

Authors:  Astrid A M van der Veldt; Martijn R Meijerink; Alfons J M van den Eertwegh; Epie Boven
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 4.493

9.  Skeletal metastases from renal cell carcinoma: diagnostic uncertainty with molecular imaging.

Authors:  Swaroop Revannasiddaiah; Ashwani Sood; Priyanka Thakur; Mukesh Sharma
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2012-08-24

Review 10.  Functional imaging of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Nathan Lawrentschuk; Ian D Davis; Damien M Bolton; Andrew M Scott
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.