PURPOSE: The purpose is to develop new analytical methods to study the expression profile of CPT-11 carboxylesterases and topoisomerase I in colon tumor samples and understand the impact of their expression on CPT-11 metabolism in chemotherapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We investigated 24 colon tumors for expression of carboxylesterases CES1A1, CES2, CES3, hBr-3, and topoisomerase I genes by real-time PCR and correlated the gene expression with activity assays. The relative abundance of the carboxylesterase isoenzymes and topoisomerase I genes was determined by real-time PCR. Activity assays performed on colon tumor extracts included CPT-11 hydrolase, 4-methylumbelliferyl acetate hydrolase, and topoisomerase I activity assays. Additionally, nondenaturing activity gel electrophoresis with activity staining showed the distribution of carboxylesterases. RESULTS: We detect the expression of CES1A1, CES2, and CES3 carboxylesterase genes in human colon tumors. We were unable to detect the hBr-3 (also called hCE-3) in human liver, colon, or brain. We find large interindividual variation, >/=150-fold, for both CES1A1 and CES3 genes, 23-fold for CES2, and 66-fold for topoisomerase I. Only CES2 gene expression correlated with the carboxylesterase activity assays (P < 0.01) with CPT-11 and 4-methylumbelliferyl acetate as substrates. Nondenaturing activity gel electrophoresis showed that CES2 was the most predominant activity. Topoisomerase I gene expression significantly correlated with topoisomerase I activity (P < 0.01) in the colon tumors, but interindividual variation was very high. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that CES2 is the most abundant carboxylesterase in colon tumors that is responsible for CPT-11 hydrolysis. This pilot study reinforces the hypothesis that there is a large interindividual variation in expression of carboxylesterases that may contribute to variation in therapeutic outcome and/or toxicity of CPT-11 therapy for colon cancer.
PURPOSE: The purpose is to develop new analytical methods to study the expression profile of CPT-11carboxylesterases and topoisomerase I in colon tumor samples and understand the impact of their expression on CPT-11 metabolism in chemotherapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We investigated 24 colon tumors for expression of carboxylesterases CES1A1, CES2, CES3, hBr-3, and topoisomerase I genes by real-time PCR and correlated the gene expression with activity assays. The relative abundance of the carboxylesterase isoenzymes and topoisomerase I genes was determined by real-time PCR. Activity assays performed on colon tumor extracts included CPT-11 hydrolase, 4-methylumbelliferyl acetate hydrolase, and topoisomerase I activity assays. Additionally, nondenaturing activity gel electrophoresis with activity staining showed the distribution of carboxylesterases. RESULTS: We detect the expression of CES1A1, CES2, and CES3 carboxylesterase genes in humancolon tumors. We were unable to detect the hBr-3 (also called hCE-3) in human liver, colon, or brain. We find large interindividual variation, >/=150-fold, for both CES1A1 and CES3 genes, 23-fold for CES2, and 66-fold for topoisomerase I. Only CES2 gene expression correlated with the carboxylesterase activity assays (P < 0.01) with CPT-11 and 4-methylumbelliferyl acetate as substrates. Nondenaturing activity gel electrophoresis showed that CES2 was the most predominant activity. Topoisomerase I gene expression significantly correlated with topoisomerase I activity (P < 0.01) in the colon tumors, but interindividual variation was very high. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that CES2 is the most abundant carboxylesterase in colon tumors that is responsible for CPT-11 hydrolysis. This pilot study reinforces the hypothesis that there is a large interindividual variation in expression of carboxylesterases that may contribute to variation in therapeutic outcome and/or toxicity of CPT-11 therapy for colon cancer.
Authors: Peter J Dickinson; Richard A LeCouteur; Robert J Higgins; John R Bringas; Richard F Larson; Yoji Yamashita; Michal T Krauze; John Forsayeth; Charles O Noble; Daryl C Drummond; Dmitri B Kirpotin; John W Park; Mitchel S Berger; Krystof S Bankiewicz Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2010-05-20 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Suzanne J Bakewell; Adam Carie; Tara L Costich; Jyothi Sethuraman; J Edward Semple; Bradford Sullivan; Gary V Martinez; William Dominguez-Viqueira; Kevin N Sill Journal: Nanomedicine Date: 2017-01-20 Impact factor: 5.307
Authors: Jie Li; Yi Kuang; Junfeng Shi; Jie Zhou; Jamie E Medina; Rong Zhou; Dan Yuan; Cuihong Yang; Huaimin Wang; Zhimou Yang; Jianfeng Liu; Daniela M Dinulescu; Bing Xu Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2015-09-14 Impact factor: 15.336