Literature DB >> 14580969

Characterization of resistance patterns and detection of apramycin resistance genes in Escherichia coli isolated from swine exposed to various environmental conditions.

Alan G Mathew1, Debbie B Arnett, Patricia Cullen, Paul D Ebner.   

Abstract

Weaned pigs were separated into eight treatments including a control without exposure to apramycin; a control with exposure to apramycin; and apramycin plus either cold stress, heat stress, overcrowding, intermingling, poor sanitation, or intervention with oxytetracycline, to determine the effects of management and environmental conditions on antibiotic resistance among indigenous Escherichia coli. Pigs exposed to apramycin sulfate received that antibiotic in the feed at a concentration of 150 g/ton for 14 days. Environmental treatments were applied 5 days following initial antibiotic administration and maintained throughout the study. Fecal samples were obtained on day 0 (prior to antibiotic treatment) and on days 2, 7, 14, 28, 64, 148, and 149. E. coli were isolated and tested for resistance to apramycin using a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) broth microdilution method. Macrorestriction profiling, arbitrarily primed PCR, PCR targeting a gene coding for apramycin resistance, and DNA hybridization were used to characterize genetic elements of resistance. Increased (P<0.0001) resistance to apramycin was noted in E. coli from all treatment groups administered apramycin. MICs of isolates from control pigs receiving apramycin returned to pretreatment levels following removal of the antibiotic, whereas isolates from cold stress, overcrowding, and oxytetracycline groups expressed greater (P<0.05) MICs through day 64, before returning to pretreatment levels. Genetic analysis indicated that all resistant isolates carried the aac(3)IV gene sequence and this sequence was found in a variety of E. coli isotypes. Our data indicate that E. coli resistance to apramycin is increased upon exposure to various stressors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14580969     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1605(03)00124-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol        ISSN: 0168-1605            Impact factor:   5.277


  11 in total

1.  Distribution of ten antibiotic resistance genes in E. coli isolates from swine manure, lagoon effluent and soil collected from a lagoon waste application field.

Authors:  A K Graves; L Liwimbi; D W Israel; E van Heugten; B Robinson; C W Cahoon; J F Lubbers
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 2.099

2.  Antimicrobial-resistant enteric bacteria from dairy cattle.

Authors:  Ashish A Sawant; Narasimha V Hegde; Beth A Straley; Sarah C Donaldson; Brenda C Love; Stephen J Knabel; Bhushan M Jayarao
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-11-10       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  A longitudinal investigation of the effects of age, dietary fiber type and level, and injectable antimicrobials on the fecal microbiome and antimicrobial resistance of finisher pigs.

Authors:  Tara N Gaire; Noelle R Noyes; H Morgan Scott; Aaron C Ericsson; Kara Dunmire; Mike D Tokach; Chad B Paulk; Javier Vinasco; Boyd Roenne; T G Nagaraja; Victoriya V Volkova
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 3.338

4.  Frequency and distribution of tetracycline resistance genes in genetically diverse, nonselected, and nonclinical Escherichia coli strains isolated from diverse human and animal sources.

Authors:  Andrew Bryan; Nir Shapir; Michael J Sadowsky
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  Scoping review to identify potential non-antimicrobial interventions to mitigate antimicrobial resistance in commensal enteric bacteria in North American cattle production systems.

Authors:  C P Murphy; V R Fajt; H M Scott; M J Foster; P Wickwire; S A McEwen
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 2.451

6.  Efficacious rat model displays non-toxic effect with Korean beechwood creosote: a possible antibiotic substitute.

Authors:  Anh Nguyen Thai Quynh; Neelesh Sharma; Kwang Keun Cho; Tae Jong Yeo; Ki Beom Kim; Chul Yon Jeong; Tae Sun Min; Kim Jae Young; Jin Nam Kim; Dong-Kee Jeong
Journal:  Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 1.632

7.  Characterization of Resistance Patterns and Detection of Apramycin Resistance Genes in Escherichia coli Isolated from Chicken Feces and Houseflies after Apramycin Administration.

Authors:  Anyun Zhang; Yunxia Li; Zhongbin Guan; Hongmei Tuo; Dan Liu; Yanxian Yang; Changwen Xu; Changwei Lei; Hongning Wang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Resistance to change: AMR gene dynamics on a commercial pig farm with high antimicrobial usage.

Authors:  Jolinda Pollock; Adrian Muwonge; Michael R Hutchings; Geoffrey Mainda; Barend M Bronsvoort; David L Gally; Alexander Corbishley
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Association between selected antimicrobial resistance genes and antimicrobial exposure in Danish pig farms.

Authors:  Anna Camilla Birkegård; Tariq Halasa; Kaare Græsbøll; Julie Clasen; Anders Folkesson; Nils Toft
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  In vitro Activity of Apramycin Against Carbapenem-Resistant and Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates.

Authors:  Mingju Hao; Xiaohong Shi; Jingnan Lv; Siqiang Niu; Shiqing Cheng; Hong Du; Fangyou Yu; Yi-Wei Tang; Barry N Kreiswirth; Haifang Zhang; Liang Chen
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.