Literature DB >> 14580743

To blow or not to blow: a randomised controlled trial of compression-only and standard telephone CPR instructions in simulated cardiac arrest.

Malcolm Woollard1, Anna Smith, Richard Whitfield, Douglas Chamberlain, Robert West, Robert Newcombe, Jeff Clawson.   

Abstract

This randomised controlled trial used a manikin model of cardiac arrest to compare skill performance in untrained lay persons randomised to receive either compression-only telephone CPR (Compression-only tel., n=29) or standard telephone CPR instructions (Standard tel., n=30). Performance was evaluated during standardised 10 min cardiac arrest simulations using a video recording and data from a laptop computer connected to the training manikin. A number of subjects in both groups did not open the airway. More than 75% in the Standard tel. group failed to deliver two effective initial rescue breaths, and only 17% provided an adequate inflation volume for subsequent breaths, delivering a median of only five inflations during the entire scenario. Most subjects in both groups gave chest compressions that were too shallow and at an inappropriately rapid rate. Hand position was also poor, but was worse in the group given simplified instructions. There was a significant delay to first compression in both groups, although this interval was shortened by over a minute when ventilations were eliminated from the telephone instruction algorithm (245 vs. 184 s, P<0.001). Over two-and-a-half times as many chest compressions were delivered during an average ambulance response time with compression-only telephone directions compared with standard CPR (461 vs. 186, P<0.001). These variables may be critical in predicting survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Further research is necessary to establish if modifications to scripted telephone instructions can remedy the identified performance deficiencies. Eliminating instructions for rescue breaths from scripted telephone directions will have little impact on the ventilation of most patients. Research is required to determine if the consequent reduction in the delay to starting chest compressions and the significant increase in the number of compressions delivered can increase survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14580743     DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9572(03)00174-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  8 in total

1.  [Standardized telephone-assisted instructions on resuscitation by laypersons. Feasibility study using video-assisted quality analysis].

Authors:  J C Nest; D Steinbrunner; M Karger; M Hiltl; F von Kaufmann; K-G Kanz; U Kreimeier
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  At what age can schoolchildren provide effective chest compressions? An observational study from the Heartstart UK schools training programme.

Authors:  Ian Jones; Richard Whitfield; Michael Colquhoun; Douglas Chamberlain; Norman Vetter; Robert Newcombe
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-04-27

3.  New pre-arrival instructions can avoid abdominal hand placement for chest compressions.

Authors:  Tonje S Birkenes; Helge Myklebust; Jo Kramer-Johansen
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Safety and applicability of a pre-stage public access ventilator for trained laypersons: a proof of principle study.

Authors:  Patricia Fuchs; Juliane Obermeier; Svend Kamysek; Martin Degner; Hannes Nierath; Henning Jürß; Hartmut Ewald; Jens Schwarz; Martin Becker; Jochen K Schubert
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2017-12-04

5.  Interventions to improve the quality of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kuan-Yu Chen; Ying-Chih Ko; Ming-Ju Hsieh; Wen-Chu Chiang; Matthew Huei-Ming Ma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effect of listening to Nellie the Elephant during CPR training on performance of chest compressions by lay people: randomised crossover trial.

Authors:  L Rawlins; M Woollard; J Williams; P Hallam
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-12-11

7.  Knowledge and attitudes towards cardiopulmonary resuscitation and defibrillation amongst Asian primary health care physicians.

Authors:  Marcus Eh Ong; Susan Yap; Kim P Chan; Papia Sultana; Venkataraman Anantharaman
Journal:  Open Access Emerg Med       Date:  2009-11-16

8.  Using a filming protocol to improve video-instructed cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Omer Perry; Oren Wacht; Eli Jaffe; Zilla Sinuany-Stern; Yuval Bitan
Journal:  Technol Health Care       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 1.285

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.