Literature DB >> 14580736

Interposed abdominal compression CPR: a comprehensive evidence based review.

Charles F Babbs1.   

Abstract

Interposed abdominal compression (IAC)-CPR includes all steps of standard external CPR with the addition of manual mid-abdominal compressions in counterpoint to the rhythm of chest compressions. IAC-CPR can increase blood flow during CPR about 2-fold compared with standard CPR without IAC, as shown by six of six studies in computer models and 19 of 20 studies in various animal models. The addition of IAC has clinical benefit in humans, as indicated in 10 of 12 small to medium sized clinical studies. The technique increases the frequency of immediate return of spontaneous circulation for in-hospital resuscitations from roughly 25 to 50%. Improved survival to discharge is also likely on the basis of two small in-hospital trials. Possible harm from abdominal compression is minimal on the basis of 426 humans, 151 dogs and 14 pigs that received IAC in published reports. The complexity of performing IAC is similar to that of opening the airway and is less than that of other basic life support maneuvers. The aggregate evidence suggests that IAC-CPR is a safe and effective means to increase organ perfusion and survival, when performed by professionally trained responders in a hospital and when initiated early in the resuscitation protocol. Cost and logistical considerations discourage use of IAC-CPR outside of hospitals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14580736     DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9572(03)00162-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  8 in total

Review 1.  Part 7: CPR techniques and devices: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.

Authors:  Diana M Cave; Raul J Gazmuri; Charles W Otto; Vinay M Nadkarni; Adam Cheng; Steven C Brooks; Mohamud Daya; Robert M Sutton; Richard Branson; Mary Fran Hazinski
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2. 

Authors:  J P Nolan; C D Deakin; J Soar; B W Böttiger; G Smith; M Baubin; B Dirks; V Wenzel
Journal:  Notf Rett Med       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 0.826

3.  Use of the trendelenburg position in the porcine model improves carotid flow during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Filiberto Zadini; Edward Newton; Amin A Abdi; Jay Lenker; Giorgio Zadini; Sean O Henderson
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2008-11

4.  Standard versus Abdominal Lifting and Compression CPR.

Authors:  Sisen Zhang; Qing Liu; Shupeng Han; Ziran Zhang; Yan Zhang; Yahua Liu; Jing Li; Lixiang Wang
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 2.629

5.  Evaluation of abdominal compression-decompression combined with chest compression CPR performed by a new device: Is the prognosis improved after this combination CPR technique?

Authors:  Haishan Li; Chao Wang; Hongyuan Zhang; Fang Cheng; Shuang Zuo; Liyou Xu; Hui Chen; Xiaodong Wang
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 3.803

6.  Effect of Interposed Abdominal Compression on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Outcomes; a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Atefeh Ghanbari Khanghah; Mohammad Taghi Moghadamnia; Latif Panahi; Somaye Pouy; Marjan Aghajani Nargesi; Ehsan Kazemnezhad Leyli
Journal:  Arch Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2022-07-16

7.  Heart rate monitored hypothermia and drowning in a 48-year-old man. survival without sequelae: a case report.

Authors:  Fredrik Koller Lund; Johan G R Torgersen; Hans Kristian Flaatten
Journal:  Cases J       Date:  2009-08-18

8.  A Dynamic Model of Rescuer Parameters for Optimizing Blood Gas Delivery during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.

Authors:  Ali Jalali; Allan F Simpao; Jorge A Gálvez; Robert A Berg; Vinay M Nadkarni; Chandrasekhar Nataraj
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 2.238

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.