Literature DB >> 14580003

Quality of published clinical trials on asthma.

Dolores Quiñones1, Javier Llorca, Trinidad Dierssen, Miguel Delgado-Rodríguez.   

Abstract

The quality of 287 clinical trials on asthma treatment published between 1984 and 1997 is described in this article, using a scale adding to a maximum of 14 points. The mean quality score was 8.60 (standard deviation 1.55). Quality improved throughout time from 8.17 +/- 1.40 before 1989 until 9.55 +/- 1.66 after 1992. Several methodological issues were associated with higher quality, namely parallel design, longer length of the follow-up, complete description of the exclusion criteria, description of the initial and ending recruitment dates, higher sample size, explicit sample size calculation, blinding, full description of randomization, intention-to-treat analysis, full description of the intervention, and evaluation of bias. The higher statistical significance, however, was not associated with higher clinical trial quality.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14580003     DOI: 10.1081/jas-120023494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Asthma        ISSN: 0277-0903            Impact factor:   2.515


  2 in total

Review 1.  The quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in asthma: a systematic review.

Authors:  Chara Ntala; Panagiota Birmpili; Allison Worth; Niall H Anderson; Aziz Sheikh
Journal:  Prim Care Respir J       Date:  2013-12

2.  The quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in asthma: systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Chara Ntala; Panagiota Birmpili; Allison Worth; Niall H Anderson; Aziz Sheikh
Journal:  Prim Care Respir J       Date:  2013-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.