Literature DB >> 14579914

Rationale and design of the randomized, multicenter, cilostazol for RESTenosis (CREST) trial.

John S Douglas1, William S Weintraub, David Holmes.   

Abstract

Restenosis of a segment of diseased coronary artery following metallic stenting is a common clinical problem and a major limitation of the procedure. Systemic pharmacologic interventions to deal with this problem have met with little success. Several small studies suggest that cilostazol, a phosphodiesterase III inhibitor whose pharmacologic properties include antiplatelet, antithrombotic, and vasodilatory effects; a beneficial effect on serum lipids; and in vitro inhibition of smooth muscle cell proliferation, may help prevent platelet aggregation and impede the accumulation of new intimal tissue in the stented artery. The Cilostazol for RESTenosis (CREST) trial will aim to evaluate more definitively the ability of cilostazol to prevent restenosis following uncomplicated stent implantation for de novo coronary artery stenosis. In this randomized, double-blind, multicenter study, 700 patients will receive clopidogrel, aspirin, and either cilostazol or placebo after successful intracoronary stent implantation. The primary endpoint is minimal luminal diameter (MLD) of the first lesion stented after 6 months; secondary endpoints include MLD in all lesions, mean percent diameter stenosis, target lesion revascularization, and major angiographic endpoints. Safety endpoints are abnormal complete blood count and liver function tests at 1, 3, and 6 months. The trial has been initiated, and enrollment is anticipated to be concluded in 2003. Cilostazol has properties that may reduce or avert in-stent coronary restenosis. The CREST trial is a large, rigorously conducted trial that may corroborate the favorable effects of cilostazol on coronary stent restenosis suggested by earlier studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14579914      PMCID: PMC6654504          DOI: 10.1002/clc.4960261004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cardiol        ISSN: 0160-9289            Impact factor:   2.882


  27 in total

Review 1.  Intravascular radiation for the prevention of recurrence of restenosis in coronary arteries.

Authors:  L Gruberg; R Waksman
Journal:  Expert Opin Investig Drugs       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.206

Review 2.  Treatment of in-stent restenosis.

Authors:  G S Mintz; R Mehran; R Waksman; A D Pichard; K M Kent; L F Satler; M B Leon
Journal:  Semin Interv Cardiol       Date:  1998-06

3.  Restenosis after Angioplasty.

Authors:  Mehran Moussavian; Peter J. Casterella; Paul S. Teirstein
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2001-04

4.  Impact of cilostazol on restenosis after percutaneous coronary balloon angioplasty.

Authors:  E Tsuchikane; A Fukuhara; T Kobayashi; M Kirino; K Yamasaki; T Kobayashi; M Izumi; S Otsuji; H Tateyama; M Sakurai; N Awata
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-07-06       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Initial management and long-term clinical outcome of restenosis after initially successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  W S Weintraub; Z M Ghazzal; J S Douglas; H Liberman; D C Morris; C L Cohen; S B King
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1992-07-01       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Effects of cilostazol on angiographic restenosis after coronary stent placement.

Authors:  S W Park; C W Lee; H S Kim; N H Lee; D Y Nah; M K Hong; J J Kim; S J Park
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Comparison of cilostazol versus ticlopidine therapy after stent implantation.

Authors:  S W Park; C W Lee; H S Kim; H J Lee; H K Park; M K Hong; J J Kim; S J Park
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1999-09-01       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 8.  Prevention of restenosis after percutaneous coronary interventions: the medical approach.

Authors:  S Rosanio; M Tocchi; C Patterson; M S Runge
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.249

9.  Usefulness of cilostazol versus ticlopidine in coronary artery stenting.

Authors:  Y Yoon; W H Shim; D H Lee; W B Pyun; I J Kim; Y Jang; S Y Cho
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 10.  Cilostazol.

Authors:  E M Sorkin; A Markham
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.923

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The vascular effects of cilostazol.

Authors:  William S Weintraub
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.223

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.