Literature DB >> 14579340

CAFASP3: the third critical assessment of fully automated structure prediction methods.

Daniel Fischer1, Leszek Rychlewski, Roland L Dunbrack, Angel R Ortiz, Arne Elofsson.   

Abstract

We present the results of the fully automated CAFASP3 experiment, which was carried out in parallel with CASP5, using the same set of prediction targets. CAFASP participation is restricted to fully automatic structure prediction servers. The servers' performance is evaluated by using previously announced, objective, reproducible and fully automated evaluation methods. More than 60 servers participated in CAFASP3, covering all categories of structure prediction. As in the previous CAFASP2 experiment, it was possible to identify a group of 5-10 top performing independent servers. This group of top performing independent servers produced relatively accurate models for all the 32 "Homology Modeling" targets, and for up to 43% of the 30 "Fold Recognition" targets. One of the most important results of CAFASP3 was the realization of the value of all the independent servers as a group, as evidenced by the superior performance of "meta-predictors" (defined here as predictors that make use of the output of other CAFASP servers). The performance of the best automated meta-predictors was roughly 30% higher than that of the best independent server. More significantly, the performance of the best automated meta-predictors was comparable with that of the best 5-10 human CASP predictors. This result shows that significant progress has been achieved in automatic structure prediction and has important implications to the prospects of automated structure modeling in the context of structural genomics. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14579340     DOI: 10.1002/prot.10538

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  28 in total

1.  PROSPECT-PSPP: an automatic computational pipeline for protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Jun-tao Guo; Kyle Ellrott; Won Jae Chung; Dong Xu; Serguei Passovets; Ying Xu
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Consensus alignment server for reliable comparative modeling with distant templates.

Authors:  Jahnavi C Prasad; Sandor Vajda; Carlos J Camacho
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  How significant is a protein structure similarity with TM-score = 0.5?

Authors:  Jinrui Xu; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Structural models for the protein family characterized by gamete surface protein Pfs230 of Plasmodium falciparum.

Authors:  Dietlind L Gerloff; Alison Creasey; Siarhei Maslau; Richard Carter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  LiveBench-8: the large-scale, continuous assessment of automated protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Leszek Rychlewski; Daniel Fischer
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  On the origin and highly likely completeness of single-domain protein structures.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Isaac A Hubner; Adrian K Arakaki; Eugene Shakhnovich; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Identification of correct regions in protein models using structural, alignment, and consensus information.

Authors:  Björn Wallner; Arne Elofsson
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 8.  Progress and challenges in protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Yang Zhang
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 6.809

9.  BCL::contact-low confidence fold recognition hits boost protein contact prediction and de novo structure determination.

Authors:  Mert Karakaş; Nils Woetzel; Jens Meiler
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.479

10.  Island method for estimating the statistical significance of profile-profile alignment scores.

Authors:  Aleksandar Poleksic
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.