BACKGROUND: Amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene has been proposed as a target for antibody-based therapies and as a predictor of chemoresponsiveness in advanced breast carcinoma. Few studies have concentrated on HER-2/neu gene evaluation by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on distant metastatic sites and none have been performed on cytologic samples. The current study evaluated HER-2/neu amplification by FISH on cytologic samples obtained from distant metastatic lesions of breast carcinoma to update HER-2/neu characterization through a safe and easier procedure than biopsy. METHODS: Twenty-two cytologic samples from distant metastases (12 hepatic samples, 4 skin samples, 3 pleural samples, and 3 peritoneal samples) were submitted to HER-2/neu evaluation by FISH. Seventeen corresponding primary breast tumors also were evaluated by FISH on paraffin histologic sections or on destained archival cytologic smears. RESULTS: Seven of the 22 metastases (32%) were amplified. Amplification was observed in 4 of the 12 liver metastases, in 1of the 3 ascitic fluid specimens, and in 2 of the 4 skin metastases. In all the three pleural fluid specimens, HER-2/neu was unamplified. Matched results from primary and metastatic lesions were obtained in 14 cases (5 were amplified and 9 were unamplified on both primary and metastatic tumors). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study emphasized the feasibility and advantages of two rapid and very informative techniques, such as fine-needle aspiration biopsy and FISH. Both procedures were performed to ascertain the malignant nature of a suspicious lesion and to obtain predictive markers for response. Since the advent of trastuzumab, the characterization of the molecular profile in metastatic breast disease has become increasingly important for targeted therapy selection. Copyright 2003 American Cancer Society.
BACKGROUND: Amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene has been proposed as a target for antibody-based therapies and as a predictor of chemoresponsiveness in advanced breast carcinoma. Few studies have concentrated on HER-2/neu gene evaluation by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on distant metastatic sites and none have been performed on cytologic samples. The current study evaluated HER-2/neu amplification by FISH on cytologic samples obtained from distant metastatic lesions of breast carcinoma to update HER-2/neu characterization through a safe and easier procedure than biopsy. METHODS: Twenty-two cytologic samples from distant metastases (12 hepatic samples, 4 skin samples, 3 pleural samples, and 3 peritoneal samples) were submitted to HER-2/neu evaluation by FISH. Seventeen corresponding primary breast tumors also were evaluated by FISH on paraffin histologic sections or on destained archival cytologic smears. RESULTS: Seven of the 22 metastases (32%) were amplified. Amplification was observed in 4 of the 12 liver metastases, in 1of the 3 ascitic fluid specimens, and in 2 of the 4 skin metastases. In all the three pleural fluid specimens, HER-2/neu was unamplified. Matched results from primary and metastatic lesions were obtained in 14 cases (5 were amplified and 9 were unamplified on both primary and metastatic tumors). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study emphasized the feasibility and advantages of two rapid and very informative techniques, such as fine-needle aspiration biopsy and FISH. Both procedures were performed to ascertain the malignant nature of a suspicious lesion and to obtain predictive markers for response. Since the advent of trastuzumab, the characterization of the molecular profile in metastatic breast disease has become increasingly important for targeted therapy selection. Copyright 2003 American Cancer Society.
Authors: Xingwei Wang; Bin Zheng; Roy R Zhang; Shibo Li; Xiaodong Chen; John J Mulvihill; Xianglan Lu; Hui Pang; Hong Liu Journal: Technol Cancer Res Treat Date: 2010-06
Authors: Marcia Edelweiss; Ana Paula Martins Sebastiao; Handy Oen; Mihaela Kracun; Rene Serrette; Dara S Ross Journal: Cancer Cytopathol Date: 2019-09-22 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Elizabeth A Punnoose; Siminder K Atwal; Jill M Spoerke; Heidi Savage; Ajay Pandita; Ru-Fang Yeh; Andrea Pirzkall; Bernard M Fine; Lukas C Amler; Daniel S Chen; Mark R Lackner Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-09-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Songdong Meng; Debasish Tripathy; Sanjay Shete; Raheela Ashfaq; Barbara Haley; Steve Perkins; Peter Beitsch; Amanullah Khan; David Euhus; Cynthia Osborne; Eugene Frenkel; Susan Hoover; Marilyn Leitch; Edward Clifford; Ellen Vitetta; Larry Morrison; Dorothee Herlyn; Leon W M M Terstappen; Timothy Fleming; Tanja Fehm; Thomas Tucker; Nancy Lane; Jianqiang Wang; Jonathan Uhr Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-06-11 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: C Bozzetti; F V Negri; C A Lagrasta; P Crafa; C Bassano; I Tamagnini; G Gardini; R Nizzoli; F Leonardi; D Gasparro; R Camisa; S Cavalli; S Capelli; E M Silini; A Ardizzoni Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2011-04-12 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Coya Tapia; Spasenija Savic; Urs Wagner; René Schönegg; Hedvika Novotny; Bruno Grilli; Michelle Herzog; Audrey Devito Barascud; Inti Zlobec; Gieri Cathomas; Luigi Terracciano; Georg Feichter; Lukas Bubendorf Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2007 Impact factor: 6.466