Literature DB >> 14579147

Translocation breakpoint mapping and sequence analysis in three monosomy 1p36 subjects with der(1)t(1;1)(p36;q44) suggest mechanisms for telomere capture in stabilizing de novo terminal rearrangements.

Blake C Ballif1, Keiko Wakui, Marzena Gajecka, Lisa G Shaffer.   

Abstract

Monosomy 1p36 results from a variety of chromosome rearrangements, including terminal deletions, interstitial deletions, derivative chromosomes, and complex rearrangements. Our previous molecular studies on a large cohort of monosomy 1p36 subjects suggest that a significant percentage of terminal deletions of 1p36 are stabilized by the acquisition of telomeric sequences from other chromosome ends, forming derivative chromosomes (i.e., "telomere capture"). However, the molecular mechanism(s) that results in and/or stabilizes terminal deletions of 1p36 by telomere capture is poorly understood. In this report, we have mapped the translocation breakpoints in three subjects with der(1)t(1;1)(p36;q44) chromosomes by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). These results indicate that the breakpoint locations are variable in all three subjects, with no common 1p deletion or 1q translocation breakpoints. In addition, sequence analysis of the 1p and 1q breakpoint-containing clones did not identify homologous sequences or low-copy repeats in the breakpoint regions, suggesting that nonallelic homologous recombination did not play a role in mediating these rearrangements. Microsatellite marker analysis indicates that two of the three derivative chromosomes were formed by intra-chromosomal rearrangements. These data are consistent with a number of recent reports in other model organisms that suggest break-induced replication at the site of a double-strand break may act as a mechanism of telomere capture by generating nonreciprocal translocations from terminally deleted chromosomes. Alternative models are also discussed.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14579147     DOI: 10.1007/s00439-003-1029-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  46 in total

Review 1.  Telomeres and their control.

Authors:  M J McEachern; A Krauskopf; E H Blackburn
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 16.830

2.  Recent segmental duplications in the human genome.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Bailey; Zhiping Gu; Royden A Clark; Knut Reinert; Rhea V Samonte; Stuart Schwartz; Mark D Adams; Eugene W Myers; Peter W Li; Evan E Eichler
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-08-09       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Monosomy 1p36 breakpoint junctions suggest pre-meiotic breakage-fusion-bridge cycles are involved in generating terminal deletions.

Authors:  Blake C Ballif; Wei Yu; Chad A Shaw; Catherine D Kashork; Lisa G Shaffer
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 6.150

4.  Double-strand break repair in the absence of RAD51 in yeast: a possible role for break-induced DNA replication.

Authors:  A Malkova; E L Ivanov; J E Haber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  FISH analysis of terminal deletions in patients diagnosed with cri-du-chat syndrome.

Authors:  R C Marinescu; E I Johnson; D Grady; X N Chen; J Overhauser
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.438

6.  Chromosome break-induced DNA replication leads to nonreciprocal translocations and telomere capture.

Authors:  G Bosco; J E Haber
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Characterization of 5q deletions by subtelomeric probes and spectral karyotyping.

Authors:  Y Ning; J C Liang; L Nagarajan; E Schröck; T Ried
Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet       Date:  1998-06

8.  Molecular refinement of the 1p36 deletion syndrome reveals size diversity and a preponderance of maternally derived deletions.

Authors:  Y Q Wu; H A Heilstedt; J A Bedell; K M May; D E Starkey; J D McPherson; S K Shapira; L G Shaffer
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 6.150

9.  Sequence comparison of human and yeast telomeres identifies structurally distinct subtelomeric domains.

Authors:  J Flint; G P Bates; K Clark; A Dorman; D Willingham; B A Roe; G Micklem; D R Higgs; E J Louis
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 10.  Maintenance of genome stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Richard D Kolodner; Christopher D Putnam; Kyungjae Myung
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-07-26       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  19 in total

1.  Characterization of a complex rearrangement with interstitial deletions and inversion on human chromosome 1.

Authors:  Marzena Gajecka; Caron D Glotzbach; Lisa G Shaffer
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Identification of sequence motifs at the breakpoint junctions in three t(1;9)(p36.3;q34) and delineation of mechanisms involved in generating balanced translocations.

Authors:  Marzena Gajecka; Adam Pavlicek; Caron D Glotzbach; Blake C Ballif; Malgorzata Jarmuz; Jerzy Jurka; Lisa G Shaffer
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2006-07-18       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Molecular characterisation of a mosaicism with a complex chromosome rearrangement: evidence for coincident chromosome healing by telomere capture and neo-telomere formation.

Authors:  Elyes Chabchoub; Laura Rodríguez; Enrique Galán; Elena Mansilla; Maria Luisa Martínez-Fernandez; Maria Luisa Martínez-Frías; Jean-Pierre Fryns; Joris Robert Vermeesch
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 6.318

4.  Osteopoikilosis, short stature and mental retardation as key features of a new microdeletion syndrome on 12q14.

Authors:  Björn Menten; Karen Buysse; Farah Zahir; Jan Hellemans; Sara J Hamilton; Teresa Costa; Carrie Fagerstrom; George Anadiotis; Daniel Kingsbury; Barbara C McGillivray; Marco A Marra; Jan M Friedman; Frank Speleman; Geert Mortier
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 6.318

5.  Diverse mutational mechanisms cause pathogenic subtelomeric rearrangements.

Authors:  Yue Luo; Karen E Hermetz; Jodi M Jackson; Jennifer G Mulle; Anne Dodd; Karen D Tsuchiya; Blake C Ballif; Lisa G Shaffer; Jannine D Cody; David H Ledbetter; Christa L Martin; M Katharine Rudd
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 6.150

6.  Human subtelomeric copy number gains suggest a DNA replication mechanism for formation: beyond breakage-fusion-bridge for telomere stabilization.

Authors:  Svetlana A Yatsenko; Patricia Hixson; Erin K Roney; Daryl A Scott; Christian P Schaaf; Yu-tze Ng; Robbin Palmer; Richard B Fisher; Ankita Patel; Sau Wai Cheung; James R Lupski
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Genomic profile of copy number variants on the short arm of human chromosome 8.

Authors:  Shihui Yu; Stephanie Fiedler; Andrew Stegner; William D Graf
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  Recurrent interstitial 1p36 deletions: Evidence for germline mosaicism and complex rearrangement breakpoints.

Authors:  Marzena Gajecka; Sulagna C Saitta; Andrew J Gentles; Lindsey Campbell; Karen Ciprero; Elizabeth Geiger; Anne Catherwood; Jill A Rosenfeld; Tamim Shaikh; Lisa G Shaffer
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.802

9.  Further delineation of nonhomologous-based recombination and evidence for subtelomeric segmental duplications in 1p36 rearrangements.

Authors:  Carla S D'Angelo; Marzena Gajecka; Chong A Kim; Andrew J Gentles; Caron D Glotzbach; Lisa G Shaffer; Célia P Koiffmann
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2009-03-07       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  A complete physical map of a wild beet (Beta procumbens) translocation in sugar beet.

Authors:  Daniela Schulte; Daguang Cai; Michael Kleine; Longjiang Fan; Sheng Wang; Christian Jung
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 3.291

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.