Literature DB >> 14578146

Relationship of mammographic parenchymal patterns to breast cancer risk factors and smoking in Alaska Native women.

Marilyn A Roubidoux1, Judith Salmon Kaur, Kent A Griffith, Barbara Stillwater, Paul Novotny, Jeff Sloan.   

Abstract

The purpose is to determine breast cancer risk factors and correlates of mammographic parenchymal patterns among Alaska Native women. A retrospective review was performed of mammograms and mammogram records among 528 sequential screening mammogram examinations performed in Anchorage, Alaska. Mammogram density was classified by American College of Radiology (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System) density patterns 1-4 (fat-->dense) and by percent density. Clinical data, including risk factors, ethnic group (Indian, Aleut, or Eskimo), and smoking status were obtained. Results were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Of 528 women, 164 were Indian, 155 were Aleut, and 209 were Eskimo. Mean age at first birth was lower and parity higher compared with published data in white women. Breast cancer risk factors were similar across ethnic groups. In multivariate analysis, patient age, parity, hormone replacement therapy, hysterectomy, and history of biopsy were associated, and smoking was not associated with density scores. Aleut and Indian women were less likely to have high-density mammograms than were Eskimo women (P = 0.0448). No significant differences were found between ethnic group for conventional breast cancer risk factors. Mammogram density was associated with age at screening, parity, hormone replacement therapy, hysterectomy, history of biopsy, and ethnicity but not smoking status. Eskimo women had higher mammogram density than Aleuts or Indians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14578146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  10 in total

1.  Distribution of mammographic density and its influential factors among Chinese women.

Authors:  Hongji Dai; Ye Yan; Peishan Wang; Peifang Liu; Yali Cao; Li Xiong; Yahong Luo; Tie Pan; Xiangjun Ma; Jie Wang; Zhenhua Yang; Xueou Liu; Chuan Chen; Yubei Huang; Yi Li; Yaogang Wang; Xishan Hao; Zhaoxiang Ye; Kexin Chen
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-03-16       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 2.  Association Between Lifestyle Changes, Mammographic Breast Density, and Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Sara P Lester; Aparna S Kaur; Suneela Vegunta
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 5.837

3.  Alcohol and Tobacco Use in Relation to Mammographic Density in 23,456 Women.

Authors:  Laurel A Habel; Weiva Sieh; Russell B McBride; Kezhen Fei; Joseph H Rothstein; Stacey E Alexeeff; Xiaoyu Song; Lori C Sakoda; Valerie McGuire; Ninah Achacoso; Luana Acton; Rhea Y Liang; Jafi A Lipson; Martin J Yaffe; Daniel L Rubin; Alice S Whittemore
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Long-term exposure to air pollution and mammographic density in the Danish Diet, Cancer and Health cohort.

Authors:  Stephanie Huynh; My von Euler-Chelpin; Ole Raaschou-Nielsen; Ole Hertel; Anne Tjønneland; Elsebeth Lynge; Ilse Vejborg; Zorana J Andersen
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 5.984

5.  Breast Cancer in Australian Indigenous Women: Incidence,zzm321990Mortality, and Risk Factors

Authors:  Kriscia A Tapia; Gail Garvey; Mark Mc Entee; Mary Rickard; Patrick Brennan
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2017-04-01

Review 6.  The epidemiologic factors associated with breast density: A review.

Authors:  Dong-Man Ye; Tao Yu
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 1.985

7.  Active, but not passive cigarette smoking was inversely associated with mammographic density.

Authors:  Lesley M Butler; Ellen B Gold; Shannon M Conroy; Carolyn J Crandall; Gail A Greendale; Nina Oestreicher; Charles P Quesenberry; Laurel A Habel
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 8.  Breast cancer in the Arctic--changes over the past decades.

Authors:  Stine Overvad Fredslund; Eva Cecilie Bonefeld-Jørgensen
Journal:  Int J Circumpolar Health       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 1.228

9.  Different measures of smoking exposure and mammographic density in postmenopausal Norwegian women: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Yngve Bremnes; Giske Ursin; Nils Bjurstam; Inger T Gram
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Age and ethnic differences in volumetric breast density in new zealand women: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Lis Ellison-Loschmann; Fiona McKenzie; Ralph Highnam; Andrew Cave; Jenny Walker; Mona Jeffreys
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.