Literature DB >> 14577507

The very elderly dialysis patient: indication and discontinuation of dialysis.

K Schaefer1, D von Herrath, J Faust, B Röhrich.   

Abstract

1. When the current available data in the literature is summarized it becomes evident that the majority of it supports the position that it is, at least for medical reasons, not advisable to exclude patients over the age of 80 years from chronic dialysis. 2. It is correct to say that the refusal of dialysis therapy for elderly dialysis patients would lead to a not insignificant cutting of costs, although elderly patients are not as 'expensive' as younger dialysis patients. 3. The decision to exclude patients over 80 from dialysis treatment is difficult, in our opinion, to support ethically. 4. The refusal of therapy by a dialysis patient--independent of his age--can only occur with his/her consent, as long as the patient is clearly conscious of the decision. 5. Should the patient no longer be in the condition to exercise his/her autonomy, and there is no AD, the Surrogate's Court must be consulted. 6. AD can be seen as helpful, since they not only make the decisions for physicians easier, but also because they can be seen as an act of care for family members. 7. Whenever dialysis therapy is discontinued the problematic nature of so-called essential care should be carefully considered, especially if no clear position has been taken in an AD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 14577507     DOI: 10.1023/a:1025692020673

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  7 in total

1.  Is the loss of health-related quality of life during renal replacement therapy lower in elderly patients than in younger patients?

Authors:  P Rebollo; F Ortega; J M Baltar; F Alvarez-Ude; R Alvarez Navascués; J Alvarez-Grande
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.992

2.  Outcome of renal replacement therapy in the very elderly.

Authors:  K Schaefer; D von Herrath; B Röhrich
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.992

3.  The dilemma of renal replacement therapy in patients over 80 years of age. Dialysis should not be withheld.

Authors:  K Schaefer; B Röhrich
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.992

4.  Dialysis in the elderly, to treat or not to treat?

Authors:  N Mallick; A El Marasi
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.992

5.  Is it worth performing kidney replacement therapy on patients Over 80?

Authors:  B Röhrich; G Asmus; D von Herrath; K Schaefer
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.992

6.  Outcome of renal replacement therapy in the very elderly.

Authors:  S K Munshi; N Vijayakumar; N A Taub; H Bhullar; T C Lo; G Warwick
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.992

7.  Optimum dialysis treatment for patients over 60 years with primary renal disease. Survival data and clinical results from 242 patients treated either by haemodialysis or haemofiltration.

Authors:  K Schaefer; G Asmus; E Quellhorst; A Pauls; D von Herrath; J Jahnke
Journal:  Proc Eur Dial Transplant Assoc Eur Ren Assoc       Date:  1985
  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Hospital admissions in elderly patients on chronic hemodialysis.

Authors:  Yijuan Sun; Hussein Kassam; Muniru Adeniyi; Milagros Martinez; Emmanuel I Agaba; Aideloje Onime; Karen S Servilla; Dominic S C Raj; Glen H Murata; Antonios H Tzamaloukas
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  The Full Spectrum of Clinical Ethical Issues in Kidney Failure. Findings of a Systematic Qualitative Review.

Authors:  Hannes Kahrass; Daniel Strech; Marcel Mertz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.