OBJECTIVE: To comparatively assess the psychological, social well-being and general state of health in patients with stage 1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (according to 1997 TNM), who underwent either elective nephron sparing surgery (NSS) or radical nephrectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated the health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) in 88 patients who underwent radical nephrectomy and in 56 treated with elective NSS. The measurement of the main QoL components has been made using domain-specific questionnaires tested and validated in Italian language. Each questionnaire has been self-administrated during follow-up (cross-sectional study). RESULTS: The two analysed group resulted perfectly comparable regarding age, gender, civil status, educational level, profession and mean follow-up. A low level anxiety has been documented in 11.4% of patients after radical nephrectomy and in 1.8% of those treated with an elective conservative surgery. The mean score difference between the two groups resulted statistically significant (p = 0.003). A mild depression has been recorded in 7% of patients who underwent radical nephrectomy and in 2.3% of NSS group. The mean score difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p = 0.01). The general health status was impaired in 12.5% of cases after radical nephrectomy and in 7% after elective NSS. Social problems were present in 18% of patients who underwent radical nephrectomy and in 18% of NSS group. There was no significant difference between radical and conservative group in terms of both General health Questionnaire and Social Problem Questionnaire mean scores. CONCLUSION: HR-QoL in patients who underwent surgery for RCC is not particularly negatively affected. Nevertheless, the comparative analysis of the results showed that, at a long term follow-up, radical surgery seems to eventually cause a more relevant negative impact on the psychological well-being than conservative surgery.
OBJECTIVE: To comparatively assess the psychological, social well-being and general state of health in patients with stage 1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (according to 1997 TNM), who underwent either elective nephron sparing surgery (NSS) or radical nephrectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated the health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) in 88 patients who underwent radical nephrectomy and in 56 treated with elective NSS. The measurement of the main QoL components has been made using domain-specific questionnaires tested and validated in Italian language. Each questionnaire has been self-administrated during follow-up (cross-sectional study). RESULTS: The two analysed group resulted perfectly comparable regarding age, gender, civil status, educational level, profession and mean follow-up. A low level anxiety has been documented in 11.4% of patients after radical nephrectomy and in 1.8% of those treated with an elective conservative surgery. The mean score difference between the two groups resulted statistically significant (p = 0.003). A mild depression has been recorded in 7% of patients who underwent radical nephrectomy and in 2.3% of NSS group. The mean score difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p = 0.01). The general health status was impaired in 12.5% of cases after radical nephrectomy and in 7% after elective NSS. Social problems were present in 18% of patients who underwent radical nephrectomy and in 18% of NSS group. There was no significant difference between radical and conservative group in terms of both General health Questionnaire and Social Problem Questionnaire mean scores. CONCLUSION:HR-QoL in patients who underwent surgery for RCC is not particularly negatively affected. Nevertheless, the comparative analysis of the results showed that, at a long term follow-up, radical surgery seems to eventually cause a more relevant negative impact on the psychological well-being than conservative surgery.
Authors: Jennifer Jones; Jaimin Bhatt; Jonathan Avery; Andreas Laupacis; Katherine Cowan; Naveen Basappa; Joan Basiuk; Christina Canil; Sohaib Al-Asaaed; Daniel Heng; Lori Wood; Dawn Stacey; Christian Kollmannsberger; Michael A S Jewett Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Theresa Junker; Louise Duus; Benjamin S B Rasmussen; Nessn Azawi; Lars Lund; Ole Graumann; Birgitte Nørgaard Journal: Syst Rev Date: 2022-01-04
Authors: Michelle L Arnold; David D Thiel; Nancy Diehl; Kevin J Wu; Steve Ames; Alexander S Parker Journal: BMC Urol Date: 2013-10-22 Impact factor: 2.264