Literature DB >> 14576753

Estimates of percentage body fat in young adolescents: a comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and air displacement plethysmography.

D Radley1, P J Gately, C B Cooke, S Carroll, B Oldroyd, J G Truscott.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of percentage body fat (%fat) estimates from air displacement plethysmography (ADP) against an increasingly recognised criterion method, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), in young adolescents.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional evaluation.
SETTING: Leeds General Infirmary, Centre for Bone and Body Composition Research, Leeds, UK.
SUBJECTS: In all, 28 adolescents (12 males and 16 females), age (mean+/-s.d.) 14.9+/-0.5 y, body mass index 21.2+/-2.9 kg/m(2) and body fat (DXA) 24.2+/-10.2% were assessed.
RESULTS: ADP estimates of %fat were highly correlated with those of DXA in both male and female subjects (r=0.84-0.95, all P<0.001; s.e.e.=3.42-3.89%). Mean %fat estimated by ADP using the Siri (1961) equation (ADP(Siri)) produced a nonsignificant overestimation in males (0.67%), and a nonsignificant underestimation in females (1.26%). Mean %fat estimated by ADP using the Lohman (1986) equations (ADP(Loh)) produced a nonsignificant underestimation in males (0.90%) and a significant underestimation in females (3.29%; P<0.01). Agreement between ADP and DXA methods was examined using the total error (TE) and methods of Bland and Altman (1986). Males produced a smaller TE (ADP(Siri) 3.28%; ADP(Loh) 3.49%) than females (ADP(Siri) 3.81%; ADP(Loh) 4.98%). The 95% limits of agreement were relatively similar for all %fat estimates, ranging from +/-6.57 to +/-7.58%. Residual plot analyses, of the individual differences between ADP and DXA, revealed a significant bias associated with increased %fat (DXA), only in girls (P<0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that ADP, at present, has unacceptably high limits of agreement compared to a criterion DXA measure. The ease of use, suitability for various populations and cost of ADP warrant further investigation of this method to establish biological variables that may influence the validity of body fat estimates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14576753     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601702

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0954-3007            Impact factor:   4.016


  6 in total

1.  Elevated reward response to receipt of palatable food predicts future weight variability in healthy-weight adolescents.

Authors:  Samantha R Winter; Sonja Yokum; Eric Stice; Karol Osipowicz; Michael R Lowe
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  Body composition assessment in overweight women: validation of air displacement plethysmography.

Authors:  Hailee L Wingfield; Abbie E Smith-Ryan; Mary N Woessner; Malia N Melvin; Sarah N Fultz; Rachel M Graff
Journal:  Clin Physiol Funct Imaging       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 2.273

3.  Body Fat Measurements in Singaporean Adults Using Four Methods.

Authors:  Xinyan Bi; Yi Ting Loo; Christiani Jeyakumar Henry
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 5.717

4.  Relationship between Body Composition and Pulmonary Function in Early Adult Life: A Cross-Sectional Analysis Nested in Two Birth Cohort Studies.

Authors:  Paula Duarte de Oliveira; Fernando C Wehrmeister; Rogelio Pérez-Padilla; Helen Gonçalves; Maria Cecília F Assunção; Bernardo Lessa Horta; Denise P Gigante; Fernando C Barros; Ana Maria Baptista Menezes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Resulting Shifts in Percentile and Standard Placements after Comparison of the BOD POD and DXA.

Authors:  Timothy Heden; Steve Shepard; John Smith; Kay Covington; James Lecheminant
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2008-07-15

6.  Body Composition Assessment by Air-Displacement Plethysmography Compared to Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry in Full-Term and Preterm Aged Three to Five Years.

Authors:  Inge A L P van Beijsterveldt; Victoria A A Beunders; Alja Bijlsma; Marijn J Vermeulen; Koen F M Joosten; Anita C S Hokken-Koelega
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 4.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.